The Wise Report Provides Government Updates for Areas of Interest to HGS Professionals.
Check out the Latest Wise Reports below...
Release Date: 5 January 2007
Release Date: 2 January 2007
Release Date: 18 December 2006
Release Date: 5 December 2006
Release Date: 5 December 2006
Release Date: 30 November 2006
Release Date: 25 November 2006
Release Date: 8 November 2006
Release Date: 1 November 2006
Release Date: 4 October 2006
Release Date: 22 September 2006
Release Date: 8 September 2006
Release Date: 6 September 2006
Release Date: 24 August 2006
Release Date: 24 August 2006
Release Date: 3 August 2006
Release Date: 27 June 2006
Release Date: 21 June 2006
Release Date: 15 June 2006
Release Date: 8 June 2006
Release Date: 8 June 2006
Release Date: 7 June 2006
Release Date: 2 June 2006
Release Date: 5 May 2006
Release Date: 4 May 2006
Release Date: 1 May 2006
Release Date: 26 April 2006
Release Date: 3 April 2006
Release Date: 3 April 2006
Release Date: 29 March 2006
The Houston Geological Society is powered by a community that cares.
Your donation supports students, technical programs, outreach, and the partnerships that strengthen our geoscience community. If HGS has helped you learn or connect, please consider giving back
Upcoming Election for the AAPG House of Delegates
AAPG active members who would like to be elected to the upcoming House of Delegates, representing the Houston region can volunteer to run in an upcoming election. The deadline to volunteer to run is January 15, 2007.
If you would like to nominate yourself, call Martha Lou Brossard at 713-348-4492 or email her at mlbrou@rice.edu. Elected AAPG delegates meet for a group lunch each month and serve for 3 years.
For more information click here .
Click here to download a copy of the January 2007 HGS Bulletin.
Geological Auxiliary joined other Petroleum auxiliaries for a spectacular event January 29th at the Junior League. Talbot''s fashion show entertained all the ladies. Attendance was over the top. Chairperson Linnie Edwards chose a fine luncheon and setting to host this successful event. Congratulations to Linnie and her committee.
February 12 the ladies will return to the Junior League for our own auxiliary''s annual Game Day and luncheon. do not miss the fun. Call in your Reservations early. Watch for your invitation in The Eclectic Log our own calendar and information source.
More events ahead thru May. Come out and enjoy these outings with your officers. Officers and chairpersons take pride in planning parties for your pleasure. Support their efforts and attend all activities.
Currently, Jan. 31, Feb. 1 and Feb. 2 many of our group are volunteering at winter NAPE. Their efforts represent us well. Consider joining them next August.
Photos are of our December luncheon. Broadway style music was presented by the award winning Dulles Honor Choir. The fresh young faces and enthusiastic performance cheered us all. Many door prizes made everyone feel lucky. One table monopolized the prizes--You know who you are! Next our final treat was a book signing by our debuting author Ray Blackhall.
Photos
977 - The enthralled group
979 - Lucky Winners
Report submitted by
3rd V. P. Donna Parrish
December 4, 2006
Up Coming Events Joint HGS/North American General Dinner
Sponsor: GGSSpeaker''s Name: Bradford Prather, ShellDay: Mon -Dec-11-06 5:30 PM
Location: Westchase Hilton 9999 Westheimer Rd. Houston, TX 77042 Summary: Thinking outside the pond: benchmarking performance expectations for deep-water reservoirs using analog data from the GoM B. E. Prather, C. J. O''Byrne, and C. Pirmez, all at Shell International E&P, Inc., Houston, TX
Industry has a considerable knowledge base from the central Gulf of Mexico (GoM) slope, yet to what extent can this database provide valid analogues for other slope systems? The GoM is viewed as an end-member above-grade ponded slope system in many conceptual models. This end-member status leads to both a de-emphasis of the value of applying knowledge derived from the GoM elsewhere and the value of applying knowledge from other slope systems to the GoM. But, the GoM slope contains examples of both a) ponded reservoirs (where receiving basin topography trapped entire flow volumes transported by variable flow sizes) and b) cases where flows of variable size and volume were far less affected by confining topography and hence have potential as partial analogues for comparable (dimensions, grainsize) systems in less topographically confined settings.
Register Mapquest | Add to Calendar
Legendary Fields- Special Dinner Meeting
Speaker''s Name: Distinguished geologists, Shell, Soveriegn Energy, PemexDay: Mon 8-Jan-07 5:30 PM
Location: Westchase Hilton 9999 Westheimer Rd. Houston, TX Summary: Three Legendary Giant Fields and their Discovery StoriesBy HGS Vice President Andrea Reynolds, co-written by Linda Sternbach Field name Zafiro field location Equatorial Guinea, offshore west Africa, near the Nigeria borderOperator: ExxonMobil and Devon EnergyReserve size 1.2 billion barrels in several satellite fieldsDiscovery date Prospect mapped in 1993, field discovered-1995 Field name Mars field location offshore U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Mississippi Canyon.Operator: Shell Offshore/BPReserve size 700 Million BarrelsDiscovery date Prospect mapped in 1986, field discovered-1989 Field name Cantarell field location offshore Yucatan Peninsula, MexicoOperator: Pemex Exploración y Producción (PEP)Reserve size 11 billion barrels produced, 7 Billion remaining (source:Pemex)Discovery date discovered-1976, first oil-1979
Register Mapquest | Add to Calendar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARE YOU MISSING THE BULLETIN OR OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION?IT JUST MIGHT BE YOUR PROFILE
Please log in and update your profile on the website. If you do not know your username and/or password contact webmaster@hgs.org
HGS December 2006 Bulletin
Click here to download the December 2006 HGS Bulletin in PDF format.
The Houston Geological Society and Geophysical Society of Houston moved to the new shared office to 14811 St. Mary’s Lane near I-10 and Dairy Ashford in January 2007. We moved from the previous office at 10575 Katy Freeway near Beltway 8 after being there 5 years. The new office at 14811 St. Mary’s Lane, Suite 250, will be staffed by full time HGS/GSH employees Joan Henshaw and Lilly Hargrave.
Present at the lease signing on Nov 29, 2006 are: Steve Brachman (HGS President), Cheryl Desforges (HGS Treasurer), GSH Past-President Dave Agarwal, and HGS President-Elect Linda Sternbach. Roshan Agarwal was also present as leasing agent.
In January 2007 volunteers chipped in and helped unpack and hang up pictures. Click here to see the newly decorated office.
Arthur E. Berman
Twenty years ago a friend and I
had a brilliant idea: if people could
pay for their groceries with a credit card instead of writing a check,
supermarket lines would move more quickly and the companies that owned the
stores would have immediate payment. We
researched the concept and consulted experts who told us that the idea would
never work for a variety of reasons that aren’t important now. What is important is that many of us now
routinely pay for groceries and most other purchases with a credit or debit
card. I don’t even have a check book
anymore and only use a few computer-generated checks each month to deal with
the rare and somewhat backward companies that don’t yet have a way to pay bills
electronically.
Not everyone, of course, has
embraced electronic payment of purchases and bills. I sometimes still find myself behind someone
in line at a store who is writing a check, showing their driver’s license and,
ironically, waiting for electronic approval of their check. While it seems inevitable that some day
everyone will abandon check books, it may actually take years or a generation
before the newer idea of electronic payment has become the norm.
This raises two questions that
are pertinent to us as geologists and scientists: how do new ideas originate and how do they
spread? I believe these questions go to
the core of geological inquiry and human psychology. After a quick look at the history of new
ideas that have been accepted in science, I’ll describe how this applies in the
petroleum exploration and production business.
Consider the beginnings of
geology. The ideas of James Hutton and
Charles Lyell about the Earth, its age and the processes that governed the
development of the crust and its sedimentary strata were considered radical in
their time. These ideas were not easily
or quickly accepted by the contemporary scientific community, much less the
educated public. New notions about the
Earth’s history along with ’s
observations on the origins of life a few years later significantly disturbed
the belief structure of 19th century society.
New Ideas: Archetypal Ideas,
Theories, Discoveries and Inventions
The origin of new ideas has been
debated since at least the time of Socrates.
I will briefly and humbly add my views on where ideas come from to those
of Plato, Descartes, Leibniz and Kant.
It seems to me that there are
relatively few truly new ideas. Ideas of
God, the spirit or soul, the after-life or reincarnation may be examples of
truly original thought. The idea of tools, language and writing must have
originated more-or-less independent of observation or explanation. These are what may be called primordial or
archetypal ideas and may, in fact, prove to be somehow hard-wired into our
psyche, stored in our DNA, or to be self-replicating by some mimetic
process.
Many new ideas in science are
really theories. Theories attempt to
explain phenomena or make mysteries somehow comprehensible, but are based on
conjecture and probably lie beyond experimental or tangible proof. Newton’s theory of gravitation, Darwin’s
theory of evolution and Einstein’s theory of relativity, while based on
observational science and at least partly supported by fact, represent
astonishing and unifying insights that place them in the rarified realm of new
ideas. A structured theory may be called
a model.
Most new ideas are really
discoveries or inventions. Discoveries
and inventions result from observation and experimentation, respectively, and
often arise from trying to solve a problem. Use of fire was probably discovered
after lightning ignited a tree or a rock falling on another rock produced a
spark: these were observations. Learning
to produce fire was an invention and was probably successful only after
considerable trial-and-error. The wheel
likely was an invention that resulted from observing a rounded object—a tree
limb or a rock--roll. Similarly the
development of agriculture or domestication of animals probably was more of a
discovery based on an observation than a truly new idea. We observed something growing that we could
eat, discovered its seed, and experimented to grow the plant intentionally.
Most great scientific advances
are likewise inventions or discoveries rather than new ideas. Steam rising from boiling water developed
into the hypothesis that perhaps a gas was a form of matter; experimentation
with fire, water and machine produced the steam engine. The train resulted from an experiment to
marry the steam engine and the wheel with a modification—the track. The automobile resulted similarly from the
observation that ethanol (or, later, petroleum) produced energy and, combined
with the wheel and an engine, could result in a new invention, the car.
Discovery may be spontaneous and
un-premeditated depending on the circumstance or point of view. The discovery of penicillin, for example, is
commonly portrayed as a kind of accident whose significance was immediately
grasped by Alexander Fleming. In fact, the development of penicillin occurred
over a period of several decades, beginning with Louis Pasteur’s discovery of
the antibiotic properties of certain bacteria. Fleming accidentally discovered
the particular strain of penicillin but it was Howard Florey after him who
finally perfected the culturing of the bacteria for medicinal application.
The ability to identify and
deduce new connections and patterns in nature and technology is the basis of
experiment and invention. The development of new ideas is seldom an individual
phenomenon but it born in the creativity of the collective ingenuity of the
many.
The Origin of New Ideas
The impetus for new ideas
originates in personal experience that is, above all, grounded in the moment,
in the present and, for the most part, separate from the ego or the
intellect. New i
by Arthur E. Berman
On September 29, 2006 spot
natural gas prices at the Henry, Louisiana Hub reached a 5-year low, closing at
$3.46 per million British Thermal Units (MMBTU), down 75% from the all-time
high price in October 2005 of $13.44/ MMBTU (Fig. 1). This abrupt departure from the steady
increase in price over the past six years could bring about a crisis in the
domestic gas and petroleum service industries.
Short-term volatility has characterized
natural gas prices since the mid-1990s following a period of relative price
stability. Prices rose from 2002 through
2005 but have fallen dramatically since the beginning of 2006. Industry experts are struggling to determine
whether recent declines in the price of gas since November, 2005 reflect an
adjustment or a longer-term trend toward lower natural gas prices.
The analysis that follows will
show that gas prices show a stronger correlation with the number of months
supply of natural gas in underground storage than with actual supply and demand
relationships. Current gas price trends
suggest that low gas prices should continue, perhaps for several years. This
will result in drilling and production curtailments which, in turn, will cause
concern about future gas supply. This, along with demand rebound because of
lower price, will allow gas prices to rise once again over the next several
years.
The Simple Explanation for Natural Gas Price Fluctuations
Natural gas price fluctuations
are commonly explained by weather patterns or random events such as hurricanes
or infrastructure malfunctions. For
example, short-term price anomalies in the winters of 1996 and 1997 (Fig. 1)
were explained by cold weather. The
biggest historical natural gas price anomaly occurred in October, 2005 when
spot gas prices rose above $13/MMBTU.
This was explained by hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which combined to
disrupt 650 billion cubic feet (BCF) of gas production, 18% of annual
production, in the (Energy Assurance Daily,
October, 2005).
The following winter of 2005-2006
was exceptionally mild and resulted in a decline in spot gas prices to
$8.72/MMBTU. This is the first clue that
the simple weather pattern explanation for gas fluctuations may be misleading
since weaker demand for heating energy did not begin to offset the lost gas
supply that resulted from the hurricanes a few months earlier.
In order to evaluate the
correlation between weather and gas price, it is necessary to calibrate temperature
anomalies with gas consumption. Maximum
seasonal variance in gas usage due to weather alone was the 0.17 TCF difference
between January consumption during the cold winters of 1994 and 1996, and usage
during the milder January of the intervening winter of 1995 (Fig. 2). The resulting difference in price was less
than $2/MMBTU.
In the case of the price drop in
2005-2006, it is interesting to note that the price of spot gas had already
fallen from $13.44 to $8.72 by January, 2006, before the winter heating season
had begun in earnest, despite the loss of 0.65 TCF in gas production, an amount
more than 3 times the magnitude of any seasonal variance in consumption.
Gas prices fell an additional
$2.00/MMBTU through the summer of 2006, which was the second-hottest summer on
record, second only to the dustbowl summer of 1936 (NOAA Website, 2006). This should have been a time of increased gas
consumption for cooling, probably comparable to an exceptionally cold winter.
Clearly, the simple explanation
for natural gas price and usage fluctuations does not tell the entire story.
Predicting Gas Prices From Recent Trends
There are many methods for
predicting future gas prices which, despite their uncertainties, are useful for
estimating how gas prices may behave in the nearterm. A simple approach is to develop a general
trend-line for the overall pattern of gas prices apart from events that produce
anomalous spikes (Figure 3). This method
predicts that overall gas prices will remain below $6/MMBTU until the spring of
2008, will not get to $7 until early 2009, and will not reach $8 again until
some time in the summer of 2009.
According to Simmons &
Company, an overall gas price of $6.60 is necessary to sustain profitable gas
exploration in the
at current drilling and equipment costs; both exploration drilling and
production of gas will substantially decrease with prices below $5.70 (Lyle,
2006). Based on that figure, favorable conditions for drilling and production
may not return until at least the end of 2008.
Supply and Demand Considerations
In order to objectively evaluate
the meaning of gas price fluctuation, and to specifically understand the
dramatic price decline that has taken place in the year since hurricanes
Katrina and Rita, it is necessary to review the basics of supply and demand for
natural gas in the United States.
gas consumption (demand) was in balance with domestic gas production until
1987. Consumption increased from 16.2
TCF in 1986 to a peak of 23.3 TCF in 2000 (Fig. 4). Since the mid-1990s, the United
States has had an average 2 TCF disparity
between domestically produced natural gas (marketed gas) and the amount of gas
consumed. Most of this deficit has been
filled from increased output in the United
States and from imports from
(Fig. 5).
North American natural gas
Houston Gelogical Society November 2006 Bulletin
To obtain a copy of the Bulletin in PDF format, click here.
Houston Geological Society October 2006 Bulletin
Click here to download a copy of the October 2006 HGS Bulletin in PDF format.
AAPG Publication Pipeline Geoscientists Helping Geoscientists Annual Report Fiscal year 2005-2006
The Mission of the Publication Pipeline The mission of the AAPG Publication Pipeline Committee is to improve geoscience education in overseas countries by providing used geoscience books and periodicals at no cost to university libraries and other libraries that request them. The AAPG Publication Pipeline committee collects, inventories, boxes, stores, and sends, free of charge to the recipients, donated geoscience periodicals and books to university libraries and other libraries overseas which are in need of them for use by the students, faculty, and researchers. We arrange shipment of the publications overseas through help of companies and organizations operating in overseas areas. To date the committee has shipped over 21 tons of publications to universities that need them.
To accomplish this transfer of publications, the AAPG Publication Pipeline has been set up as an ad hoc committee of the AAPG. Donations of publications and money are credited to the AAPG Foundation which is a tax exempt organization. The foundation finances storage of donations until they are shipped. Our budget is $4000 a year. Inventory of publications accepted, and those shipped out to libraries, is important in accounting for these assets. Geoscientists Helping Geoscientists This committee is dedicated to getting books and periodicals to universities and libraries in need. Our most urgent problems are identifying universities that need the publications, finding contacts within the universities to work with the AAPG Publication Pipeline in arranging receipt of publications as well as locating companies and or organizations willing to underwrite shipment costs to the recipient countries. We have a large inventory of publications which we need to move to the end users. Donations of publications to the Publication Pipeline and distributions overseas. From July 1, 2005 to July 1, 2006 the Publication Pipeline accepted donations of geoscience publications from 25 individuals and organizations consisting of 153 boxes (5400 pounds) of publications of which 33 of the boxes wait to be picked up by the committee. We now have about 40 pallets of boxes of publications in storage, of which 70% are inventoried.
The Publication Pipeline committee is about to enter into a multi-donation arrangement with ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company to accept used publications from their library management system. The first shipment consisting of 700 boxes of publications is due to arrive at the warehouse shortly. It is exactly this type of corporate partner that is so important to the success of the committee.
This last year the committee was pleased to present the Mr. Robert Kane of the JA Green Development of Houston Texas with a certificate of appreciation for their very generous donation of warehouse space. Their efforts were recently highlighted in the Houston Business Journal’s annual philanthropic report. Without this type of corporate partnership the committee would not be able to complete its mission.
From July 2005 to July 2006 the committee shipped over 5 tons (10,500 pounds) of books to universities that needed them. These include shipments to Afghanistan with the assistance of U.S. AID and the USGS, Texas Southern University, and universities in Indonesia with the assistance of ConocoPhillips. Additional shipments are currently in progress or planned to Kazakhstan, Indonesia, Iraq (with the cooperation of the University of Aberdeen in Scotland), Papua New Guinea and Mongolia.
In addition, the committee with the help of George Klein, took a proactive approach to contact universities in the U.S. gulf coast that were hit hard by hurricanes Katrina and Rita, to see if the committee could offer assistance to their storm damaged libraries. Many of the universities in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas are still surveying the extent of their damage and have yet to request donations. Storage space is getting critical! As in years past, Robert Kane, manager for the J. A. Green Intercontinental Cargo Center West, has generously provided free storage for our donated books. As a result of the recent economic upturn coupled with our success in attracting donations, our space in his firm’s huge warehouse adjacent to Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston is filling up fast. Our current inventory is approaching 40 pallets, about 46,000 pounds, and although JA Green continues to find space for us, unless we start moving more donations overseas, there is a very real and present danger that we will exceed our capacity at the warehouse. This situation will become even more critical when we start to accept our first shipment of publications from ExxonMobil. Challenges Right now our biggest difficulty is in arranging shipments at a pace sufficient to equal our intake of donations. In spite of the general desire for publications, making contacts with universities overseas and arranging shipments is a slow process. This process is helped by working with and through our AAPG regional organizations and affiliates. We desperately need the help all AAPG members in identifying universities in need overseas. This year special emphasis will be upon getting the word out that the Publication Pipeline is open for business and that publications are available free of charge to those that need them the most. In addition we will continue contact corporate partners and government organizations to convince them that there are real advantages of all kinds to companies that donate shipping of publications to universities that need them. Donations are not only helpful to the universities, but also to the companies operating in the country or area. The cost is modest and their generosity is immediately apparent. Inventory and Webpage The process of inventorying the contents of boxes of publications is continually underway. This duty is preferably done by the donors but this last year several large donations from estates have lacked an inventory and inventories are usually not available of donations from companies as they consolidate. A grant of $1000 from Anadarko Petroleum has been received to help pay for inventorying of donated material. This grant was a result of the recognition of the tireless volunteer efforts of committee member Ray Sorenson, an Anadarko employee.
Having a complete inventory will allow us to post it on our committee webpage so those desiring donation of publications can see our holdings. A partial inventory of holdings has been put on the Publication Pipeline webpage which is reached through the AAPG website. This list of our holdings can be viewed and downloaded from the web page (www.aapg.org/committees/pubs_pipeline). Updating our webpage and working with the AAPG on its’ design is a continuing effort. Finances The AAPG has provided $4000.00 this year for expenses, which is a great help to the committee. Although the Publication Pipeline Committee is an all volunteer committee, costs are involved in the committee’s operation. Both operating budget and endowment donations of money are needed. Some donors have generously paid for shipping of their donations, but we have lost several large donations because shipping cost was too high for retired donors and the committee could not immediately comm
September 2006 HGS Bulletin
Click here to download a copy of the September 2006 HGS Bulletin in PDF format.
Next Monday is our first dinner meeting of the new fiscal year, be sure to be there for this great presentation by Anadarko''s Bob Daniels.
HGS General DinnerSponsor: Fugro Robertson, IncSpeaker''s Name: Bob Daniels, Anadarko Petroleum, Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production Day: Mon 11-September-06 5:30 PMLocation: Westchase Hilton 9999 Westheimer Houston, TX Title: Winning with Strategy: Leveraging Position, Access, and Opportunities in the Gulf of Mexico.
Important note about upcoming GCAGS
GCAGS Annual ConventionDay: Mon 25-Sepember
Location: Cajundome Convention Center 444 Cajundome Blvd Lafayette, Louisiana 70506-4264 Note that hotel rooms in Lafayette are filling up fast due to another large convention in town the same time as GCAGS.
As of August 28, the Hilton Garden Inn, the Lafayette Hilton and the Hampton Inn and Suites are totally booked, only leaving rooms at the Best Western Hotel Acadiana and the Holiday Inn Holidome. It is strongly encouraged that any out-of-towners to book their hotel room in early September as they may have a very difficult time finding a room later in the month.
Texas Professional Geoscientist can get credits for attending each HGS dinner / lunch meetings. The HGS is working on a process to provide certificates. According to the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists: "The Continuing Education Program for Professional Geoscientists becomes effective September 1, 2006. Upon renewing a P.G. license after that date, there will be a question on the renewal form asking for certification that the 15 hours of Continuing Education have been completed for that year. As of this time, no other proof of CE hours is necessary. However, it is important to keep a completed log of CE hours in your possession in cases where further proof of hours is requested. Any qualifying continuing education hours taken from September 2004 onward can be used for the 2006 yearly requirement. Any hours accumulated over the required 15 can be carried forward to the next year (up to a maximum of 30). For more details,go to the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists Website. http://www.tbpg.state.tx.us/continuing%20education.html
Attention Students! Did you know that you can attend HGS meetings and continuing education classes for free? The first 10 students who register for an event can attend for no charge and after 10, and additional students only pay 1/2 price to attend.
This policy is available through a grant from ConocoPhillips and will continue while funds last. To take advantage of this special student reservation and assure your free place, you should contact the HGS office at (713) 463-9476 although unused benefit may be available for walkups.
HGS Email Newsletter sent out August 3, 2006
Want to become a Licensed Geologist through the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists (TBPG) and need to take the ASBOG® exam? The next exam is scheduled for October 6th, but registration deadlines are fast approaching. License applications and exam request forms should be received by the TBPG office in Austin NO LATER THAN August 15th. The Board will review the applicants’ materials, determine eligibility, and send the registration packet back to you in time for you to send the exam registration form to ASBOG®, which must be postmarked by August 22nd. Don''t wait until the last minute!! The requirements for licensure are outlined at http://www.tbpg.state.tx.us/Licensing.htm. All necessary application forms are available from the TBPG website (http://www.tbpg.state.tx.us/forms.html). The ASBOG® exam is given in two parts on October 6th: - Fundamentals of Geology at 8:00 am - Practice of Geology portion at 1:00 pm. More information about the exam is available at http://www.tbpg.state.tx.us/exam-information.html. Candidate Handbooks and exam preparation material can be obtained through ASBOG® at http://www.regreview.com/asbog.html. The exam is typically administered at the TBPG office in Austin; however, if 30 HGS or NeoGeos members in Houston commit to taking the exam (and register, etc.) then the exam will be offered in Houston. Be sure to indicate your membership in these organizations on your application! (Update August 28, 2006: As of August 24 only 37 people from Houston had signed up to take the test which is not enough to have a duplicate test offered in Houston. So the October 2006 test will only be offered in Austin, Tx) The next ASBOG® exam will be held March 2, 2007, with registration deadline of January 16, 2007. Questions about licensing and the ASBOG® exam can be directed to: Annita Herrera, Director of Licensing at the TBPG or call (512) 463-6757
Instructions for HGS Online Membership Renewal
1. Log in to the HGS website.
NOTE: All current and past members of the HGS already have a login set up for this Website. Please do not register again, as the site will not recognize you as a member. If you cannot remember your username and password contact the HGS office for this information.
2. After you successfully login, click on the link My Memberships. This link can be found on the right side of the page, under Quick Links.
3. In your most recent record (there may be more than one) there will be a Renewal link highlighted in yellow. Click on this link to bring up the renewal form.
4. On the renewal form, your membership type will already be selected along with the appropriate membership fee. Choose a payment method (credit card or check). We prefer a credit card for the fastest online processing.
5. The next section, Complete the Application? Will allow you to update your membership details and contact information. If you know your contact information is complete and up-to-date, you can check “I am done, my application is complete.” If not, select “I still need to make changes in my application.” You must choose one option or the other to continue the online renewal.
6. Click on the Renew Membership button to bring up another form where you can enter your payment information and complete the transaction.
Problems / Questions? Email the HGS Webmaster Lilly, or call her at (713) 463-9476.
June 2006 Bulletin - Index Page
Click here to download the HGS Bulletin in PDF format.
TOP TEN REASONS YOUMIGHT BE A GEOLOGIST: 1. You know what leaverite is.
A Final Look Over the Editor’s Shoulder They are the unsung heros of the Bulletin, because without their help, the Bulletin would appear a lot different.
When I got a call from Craig Dingler asking me to step in to replace an open Editor-elect position late in the year, my first thought was to turn it down as quickly as possible. But then I thought it could be interesting, already being familiar with the operations of the Bulletin through my several previous stints on the Board. It has given me the opportunity to read and write about many topics in the Editor’s column. Philosophy, mythology, hurricanes, Bulletin history, polar reversal, volcanoes, the Long Point Fault and the Yoakum Channel were the varied topics, as well as last month’s insight into the world of an independent geologist. It’s amazing what you can come up with when pressed by a deadline. The photo contest suffered a slow start, but then gained momentum, and was featured in last month’s issue.
What I found is that everyone appreciates the work that goes into the Bulletin, but they do not really know what goes on behind the scenes. First, there’s the deadline, six weeks prior to the first of the month the issue will be mailed. That’s April 15 for the June issue. Then there’s about a week or more of looking for all the things that didn’t come in by the deadline. After most of the things to be published are in, they get reviewed and briefly edited by the Editor. Then they go out to the Advisory Editors for proofreading. There are three Advisory Editors, Elsa Kapitan-White, Jim Ragsdale and Charles Revilla. They are the unsung heros of the Bulletin, because without their help, the Bulletin would appear a lot different. They edit for consistency, readability, grammar, punctuation and more. And they read it at least twice, as you will see in a minute. Then they send back their edits to the Editor, who compiles the three versions into one proof copy for layout, adding his or her edits along the way. Then it is sent to our layout person, Lisa Krueger, for laying out the text and pictures into the form that you are reading right now. Lisa also provides consistency and historical knowledge from issue to issue. The entire Bulletin is then printed into an Acrobat PDF file and sent back to the Advisory Editors for yet another round of edits. They mark-up that copy, and the Editor again compiles three versions of edits into one. The layout is finalized, checking dates, page references, indexes and the calendar. It goes to the printer after it is prepared in the right format, different from the one you see, for the printer.
The Editor-elect is not sleeping during this process, either. He or she is tasked with projects like the calendar events, chasing down stray candidate or awardee photos, and generally helping the Editor with his (or her) tasks.
The advertising chairman, Lilly Hargrave, is responsible for selling and renewing advertising, getting the ad copy in and delivering it to the layout person prior to its delivery to the printer. The advertising is what keeps the Bulletin going, and pays for most if not all of the Bulletin expenses.
The Bulletin then goes from the printer to the mail house, where it is addressed and sent to the post office. And of course, a week or two before the mailing, the next deadline has passed, and the process is going again. Kind of like the instructions on your shampoo bottle, “lather, rinse, repeat.”
I have thoroughly enjoyed my term as Editor, and like all previous Editors, I wouldn’t do it again. But the team that persists on the Bulletin staff is who makes it really work, and I would like to urge everyone to thank those volunteers whenever you see them; the Advisory Editors—Elsa Kapitan-White, Jim Ragsdale and Charles Revilla, and the staff—Lilly Hargrave and Lisa Krueger, for their hard and unrelenting work that gets the Bulletin into your hands. And don’t forget the printer, Prime Source, whose flexibility when printing deadlines are missed or last minute changes have to be made has been invaluable. I would also like to thank all of the contributors to the Bulletin last year. Henry Wise and Arlin Howles faithfully provided the Government Update and were on time for every deadline. Also the organizers for each of the technical talks every month who have to be sure that the speakers provide abstracts, biographies and photos—no small task. And thanks to the authors that have submitted articles, memorials, book reviews and various HGS events that regularly post in the Bulletin.Without all of these, the Bulletin would not be what it is.
As I said earlier, it has been great fun editing the Bulletin this last year. As I prepare the final copy to go to the printer, the temptation is to pick up my red pen yet one more time for more edits. But then I decide to “leave ‘er right” there on the desk, and hand the Bulletin to my successor, Bill Rizer. Good luck, Bill.
* * * Leaverite (From Wikipedia) Leaverite is a slang term used by geologists, minerologists, and amateur rock collectors to identify a specimen in the field that may look interesting but is actually not. Rocks identified as such should be left in situ, as they are not worth the hassle of transportation or deserving of a place in a respectable collection.
The term leaverite derives from the phrase “leave it right there.” Specimens of even lesser interest are considered trashite. Top Ten Reasons You Might Be A Geologist: 10. If you have ever responded “yes” to the question, “What have you got in here, rocks?” 9. You have ever found yourself trying to explain to airport security that a rock hammer isn’t really a weapon. 8. Your rock garden is located inside your house. 7. You have taken a 15-passenger van over “roads” that are intended only for cattle. 6. You consider a “recent event” to be anything that has happened in the last hundred thousand years. 5. In an art museum, you spend more time looking at the walls than the paintings.* 4. Your photos include people only for scale and you have more pictures of your rock hammer and lens cap than of your family. 3. The souvenir collection from all your vacations consists mostly of rocks.* 2. You have been on a field trip that included scheduled stops at a highway road cut and a liquor store. 1. You know what leaverite is.* * Contributions to these reasons came from Richard Howe, Bill Rizer and Diane Yeager. Thanks, all.
Editor Column May 2006 Bulletin Have Deal - Won''t Travel
The AAPG Convention came and went last month, one of the biggest geological events that lands in Houston every few years. It consumes HGS members who volunteer for committee work and is driven by their energetic support. The convention draws people from all over the country and the world, and many friendships are renewed as colleagues who have not seen each other in years run into each other on the convention floor or around Houston. And while the AAPG Convention is a forum for medium and large companies and national oil companies, it is also a gathering place for the hundreds, even thousands, of small companies and independents that make up a large part of the United States domestic oil industry.
Among the independents, business is always at the forefront. This year, a typical greeting heard at the convention might be, "Hey, haven''t seen you in a while. What are you up to? Do you have any prospects? Do you have the leases? Do you have a rig?" Selling prospects isn''t quite what it was just a couple of years ago. Back then, a deal had to be shown repeatedly, and the question was always, "does the buyer like the deal, and do they have the money?" Now it is said, partly tongue-in-cheek, that if you have a rig available, you can sell virtually any deal.
At the beginning of 1999, oil was below $10 per barrel. Just 18 months ago, the price of oil broke the $50 per barrel ceiling. Consumers bemoaned the price of gasoline, and the national news services seized the moment. But unlike previous price run-ups, the national news was not citing the usual "big oil" culprits but was actually talking about real reasons that the price was up-increased demand, declining deliverability, reduced refining capacity, the Asian economy, a strike in Venezuela and so on. And investors, tired of a soft stock market, looked at $50 oil and said to themselves not "why is it that high?'' but "how can I get some of that action?" Private and public investment dollars are flowing into the industry in a significant way for the first time since the early 1980s. In 1992, I became an independent geologist and began selling prospects to the industry. At that time, if you were selling a prospect, you were expected to travel to the buyers to show your deals. In the course of selling prospects, I think I''ve probably been in every single office building in Houston at one time or another. To this day, when I go into a building, I may experience d‚j… vu, and have to look at the directory to see whom I may have showed a deal to in that building at sometime in the past. In the course of selling prospects, I''ve traveled to Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, Tyler, Luling, Victoria, Midland, Lafayette and even once showed a prospect on a pool table in Seguin, Texas. Once I sold a prospect to a company in Houston, and on the day we were to close, I showed up at their office, only to find the lights off and nobody home. Needless to say, the deal didn''t close, and it went back on the prospect circuit.
That prospect eventually sold, and the fellow that disappeared on me actually had the nerve to call me two years later to see if I had any deals to sell! I didn''t- at least not to him. At that time, if you were selling a prospect, you went to the money, where ever it was or appeared to be. It''s 2006, and I am now looking at prospects for investors and myself. When I began buying deals, I envisioned sitting in my office, making all those deal sellers come to me, as I once had to go to deal buyers. But I find that still I have to travel. "Yes, I have a prospect," I might be told, "but if you want to see it before it''s sold, you''d better come to my place. The sooner the better." Earlier in the week, I flew to another city to look at six prospects and had to make a decision on them before end-of-business that day or the remaining interest would be sold to another company. It has definitely changed in the last decade from a buyer''s market to a seller''s market. I think I like it better now, but wish I didn''t have to travel so much. Of course I also still sell prospects as well. And I tell the buyers, "Yes, I have a prospect, and you are welcome to come by and look at it. The sooner the better."
Government Update: HGS Bulletin, May 2006 by Henry M. Wise, P.G. and Arlin Howles, P.G. EPA News On February 17, 2006, the Houston Chronicle reported that on February 15, 2006, the EPA changed the rule on MTBE that states will no longer have to add ethanol or MTBE to gasoline. According to the Chronicle, this requirement costs as much as $0.08 per gallon of gasoline. This eliminates a mandate from the 1990 Clean Air Act that gasoline used in metropolitan areas with the worst smog contain two percent oxygenate by weight. The law did not say which oxygenate must be used, but most refiners use either ethanol or MTBE. Three states, California, New York and Connecticut, had requested a waiver of the requirement because the states had banned MTBE due to pollution of groundwater. The states were forced to use ethanol, which they contend worsened pollution problems. Ethanol reportedly makes other gasoline constituents more soluble in water. The new rules put into place a part of the energy bill President Bush signed in August that did away with the two percent oxygenate require-ment. The Chronicle quoted Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) as saying, "The announcement means that California refiners will finally be allowed to make gasoline that is cleaner burning than what they are making today." AGI Government Affairs Monthly Review (February 2006)
MMS Releases Draft 5-Year Plan for OCS Leasing Program The Minerals Management Service (MMS) released a draft proposed 5-year plan for the oil and natural gas leasing program on the outer continental shelf (OCS). More than 85% of the OCS around the lower-48 states has been placed off limits to energy development by presidential withdrawals or congressional moratoria. The current draft proposal includes studies to look at the potential for oil and gas development off the coast of Virginia and a previously undeveloped area in the North Aleutian Basin off the coast of Alaska. The inclusion of these two areas is in response to discussions with the state legislatures. The draft proposal includes 21 OCS lease sales in seven of the 26 OCS planning areas. Additional information on the draft proposed plan and on how to submit comments is available at http://www.mms.gov/5-year/2007-2012main.htm. MMS Releases Hurricane Impact Details and Requests Research Areas On January 19, 2006, the Minerals Management Service released its analysis of the effects of hurricanes Katrina and Rita on offshore platforms and pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico. According to the MMS press release, "3,050 of the Gulf''s 4,000 platforms and 22,000 of the 33,000 miles of Gulf pipelines were in the direct path" of these two hurricanes. Hurricane Katrina destroyed 46 platforms and damaged 20 others, and Hurricane Rita destroyed 69 platforms and damaged 32 others. There was "no loss of life or significant oil spills from wells on the outer continental shelf (OCS) attributed to either storm." In response to this damage on OCS offshore facilities, MMS has requested research proposals in six subject areas: "(1) Assess and evaluate pipeline movement or damage; (2) Assess and evaluate platform damage; (3) Provide hurricane hindcast data; (4) Evaluate and assess the performance of jack-up rigs; (4) Assess methods to eliminate hydrates in pipelines and risers during startups after hurricanes; and (6) Assess the response of waves and currents throughout the water column in the northern Gulf of Mexico slope and shelf." Details on the impact assessment of offshore facilities are available at http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2006/press0119.htm. Senators Seeking Response to Climate Change White Paper In early February, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chair Pete Domenici (R-NM) and Ranking Member Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) released a white paper designed "to lay out some of the key questions and design elements of a national greenhouse gas program in order to facilitate discussion and the development of consensus around a specific bill." Rather than advocate specific viewpoints on a potential greenhouse gas reduction program, the white paper poses four key questions that Senate staff hope will induce discussion between policymakers, industries and environmentalists. The questions are:
The full text of the Climate Change White Paper is available at http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=IssueItems.View&IssueItem_ID=33.
AGU Releases Ocean Research Position Statement On February 8, 2006, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) held briefings in the House and the Senate to discuss a new position statement entitled "Renewing Investment in Ocean Research." The statement, which was adopted in December 2005, endorses the findings of the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. Specifics of the Commission''s report include implementing a framework of ecosystem-based ocean management, increasing funding for basic ocean research, developing a comprehensive ocean observing system, improving ocean modeling capabilities, modernizing the entire fleet of research vessels and increasing investments in ocean education. Speaking at the briefing, Representative Sam Farr (D-CA), Co-chair of the House Oceans Caucus, noted the importance of ocean research to a number of disparate groups, including fishermen, oil companies and coastal populations. "We''re all in it together," Farr said. Dr. Steven Bohlen, Chair of AGU''s ocean statement panel, added, "We are damaging the oceans, and what we don''t know could hurt us."
The full text of AGU''s ocean research position statement is available at http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/positions/oceaninvest.shtml.
GSA Releases White Paper on Coastal Impacts of Hurricanes The Geological Society of America and the University of New Orleans have released a white paper titled "The Impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in Louisiana: America''s Coasts Under Siege." Written by Mark Kulp and Shea Penland of the University of New Orleans along with Duncan Fitzgerald of Boston University, the report details the economic importance of the Louisiana coastal zone and the human-induced loss of land in the region. The authors recommend either strategically re-engineering the coast or planning a managed retreat from the coastal areas where hazard risks are greatest. They conclu
JAMES OTIS LEWIS, JR., beloved husband, father, grandfather, and friend passed away peacefully on June 2, 2006. He was born on July 6, 1922 in Owensboro, Kentucky to the late James Otis Lewis, Sr. and Mary Shaw Lewis. He attended high school in Fulton, Kentucky and graduated from the University of Kentucky with a BS in Mechanical Engineering in 1947 and a MS in Geology in 1949. From 1943-1947 he fought in WWII while serving in the US Navy. After graduation in 1949, he moved to Houston and worked for Magnolia Petroleum Company and P.R. Rutherford. In 1955, he started his own consulting practice, focusing on geology of the Gulf Coast and southwest Texas.
He was devoted to his profession and its associations. He was president of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (1989-1990), the Houston Geological Society (1968-1969), and the Society of Independent Earth Scientists (1967-1968). He held Honorary Life Memberships in these organizations, received several Distinguished Service Awards, chaired numerous conventions, and remained involved in these organizations'' leadership throughout his life. He was preceded in death by his wife Gwinn McMahan Lewis and his sister Jane Haynes.
He is survived by his sons Blake and his wife Marianne, Emison, Calvin and his wife Louan, Sean and his wife Adrian, and Cannon and his wife Jennifer, his daughters Tara and her husband John Swords, Galin and her husband Steve Morgan, Disa and her husband George Lyon, Beryl and her husband Sam Gibson, and fourteen grandchildren. The greatest joys in Jim''s life were his wife Gwinn, his family, and sharing his knowledge of geology. He loved West Texas, traveling there often, and his weekend home in Washington County.
He was an avid pilot, handball player, and carpenter. A Memorial Reception will be held at his home on Thursday evening, June 8th, at 6:00 p.m. The family asks that donations be made in lieu of flowers. Memorials may be sent to the Friends of Big Bend National Park, the AAPG Foundation, or to the charity of your choice.
Published in the Houston Chronicle on 6/6/2006.
Presidents Column May 2006 Bulletin Business Ethics—Do No Harm The Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling trial is in full swing, and by the time this letter is published, the trial may be resolved. The issues surrounding the trial are varied and complex and it seems to get down to one man''s word against another''s word. What did upper management know and when did they know it? The only thing I know for certain is that I am glad I am not sitting on that jury. Was Enron''s demise the result of unforeseeable market forces, or was it the result of a conspiracy at the highest levels to obfuscate the true financial condition of the company in order to maintain an artificially high stock price? I have not been following the trial closely enough to have an informed opinion as to whether Enron''s upper management was culpable or merely inept. However, there have been some aspects of Enron''s business activities that have come out of the trial that have some interesting implications. Enron''s trading business was so successful that they concealed the magnitude of the profits to keep Wall Street from realizing the risks Enron was taking and recognizing that Enron was basically a trading company, rather than an energy logistics company. During its peak, Enron traded hundreds of products. Unfortunately, Wall Street does not put a significant stock-price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple on trading revenue. The value of a dollar is perceived differently depending on its source. Trading dollars have less intrinsic value because they are not as predictable as a dollar received from gas transmission or power generation. The more likely it is that a dollar of net revenue will be repeated next quar-ter, the more intrinsic value it has to Wall Street. In some respects, it is similar to the risk/reward calculations we routinely use in evaluating the relative value of drilling prospects with different risks. We all realize that exploratory prospects need higher potential reserves than development prospects because of the higher risk. However, I had not put it in the perspective that a barrel of oil (or mcf of gas) produced from a development well has a higher intrinsic value than a barrel of oil received from an exploratory well.
This then raises the question-can two dollars received from the same source have different perceived values? If you do not believe it is possible, consider the difference between Google and The New York Times. They both receive the bulk of their revenues from advertising, and they had generally comparable net earnings during 2005. Yet, Google has recently sold at a P/E multiple of 67, while during the same period, The New York Times sold at a P/E multiple of 15. Google had a market capitalization of $100 billion, whereas the Times had a market capitalization of $4 billion. Granted, Google has a potentially global reach; whereas, The New York Times'' influence, and therefore earnings potential, is more regional and limited in nature. Does that justify a five-fold difference in the P/E ratio and a 25-fold difference in market capitalization? Obviously, Wall Street believes it does. Based on its stock price, the financial fortunes of Google have declined recently. Wall Street will probably attribute the decline to one of those fabled market corrections-a change in perceptions. What does any of this have to do with business ethics? Business schools have used Enron as the type-section of what not to do in the realm of business ethics. From what has been reported in the news media, at least some of Enron''s managers who were charged with wrongdoing believed that they were acting in the best interests of Enron at the time the alleged illegal acts were committed. Could they have been so far out of touch with reality as to believe that they were doing nothing legally or ethically wrong? The previous discussion of the evaluation of the financial worth of a business suggests Wall Street''s rules of valuation are subjective. Are the rules of business management, hence business ethics, also subjective? Is ethics merely a matter of perception? Clearly, there should be a difference between what is wrong ethically and what is illegal. Some ethical considerations are black and white. You do not steal from your employer, you do not sabotage a coworker''s career, and you do not represent work done by others to be your own. But most ethical questions are colored by various shades of gray. To that extent, the rules governing business ethics may be subjective and subject to perception. However, the underlying principle for all ethical decisions has not changed since Hippocrates: it is to do no harm. A large dose of common sense goes a long way in resolving most ethical dilemmas. We all recognize that it is unethical to use your employer''s or client''s assets for your personal gain without their express permission, but is it unethical to exploit a unique situation to fulfill a requirement? Like all licensed geologists in Texas whose license will be up for renewal after September 1, I have a 15-hour continuing education requirement that includes a personal development hour of business ethics. Under the board''s rules, the preparation of this column should count toward that ethics requirement. Anyone can submit an article on any relevant topic to the HGS Bulletin for publication, and if it has some merit, it will probably get published. It will also count toward your continuing education requirement. But because the HGS president''s monthly column is not available to all licensed geologists, is it unethical for me to use it to fulfill a personal requirement for licensure? My perception is no harm, no foul.
Mark Andrew Cocker, 1953-2006: A Memorial
Mark Andrew Cocker unexpectedly passed away on April 19, 2006 in Kingwood, Texas. Mark was a gifted geologist, a good businessman, a loving husband, father, brother and son, and a good friend to all who knew and worked with him. He was born October 4, 1953 to Betty and Geoffrey Cocker in Yorkshire, England, and is survived by his wife of over 22 years, Jill (Foster) Cocker and their children, Sarah, Thomas, and Allison Cocker, all of Kingwood, TX; his mother, Betty Oakley of France; and his sisters, Sally Tyson and Gillian Worrall. Mark was Chief Operating Officer and Partner of The Scotia Group, Inc., an independent consulting services company to the oil and gas industry with offices in Dallas and Houston, Texas, and Reynosa, Tamaulipas. He was an avid outdoorsman, musician, marathon runner, sailing enthusiast, rock climber, skeet shooter, and a great admirer and lover of nature. Mark was a dedicated member and supporter of the Houston Geological Society and served as Public Relations Committee Chair for many years. He belonged to the Dallas Geological Society and served on the DGS Public Information and Government Affairs Committee. He was a Texas Certified Petroleum Geologist and Certified AAPG Geologist and served as AAPG delegate. In addition to HGS, DGS and AAPG, Mark was a member of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts and the Society of Petroleum Engineers. He was author of 5 recent papers on petroleum geology of the Burgos Basin and a frequent speaker at meetings of the many professional societies to which he belonged. Before joining The Scotia Group in 1992, Mark worked for Core Laboratories, Inc. and Improved Petroleum Recovery, Inc. He spent many of the past 10 years working on reservoir projects with Pemex in Reynosa, Poza Rica, Tampico and Veracruz, Mexico. During his career of 29 years, he worked on projects in the U. S. Onshore and Gulf of Mexico, the Middle East, Asia, the South Pacific, Africa and Europe. Mark had great focus in both his work and relationships and was often at his best when things got difficult. He knew how to look beyond obstacles, maintain perspective on objectives, and provide solid leadership and direction to his team in both work and play. He was capable of inspiring others through his steadfast resolve and quiet confidence in outcomes. Mark could be both incisively direct as well as a patient and compassionate listener. He pursued everything he did with great commitment, high standards, and impeccable personal integrity. Mark Cocker passed away in the prime of both life and profession. He will be missed by all who knew him. Arthur E. Berman, one of Mark’s many friends and colleagues.
Paul Babcock
Paul is currently working at Peoples Energy Production Company, where he is Vice-President of Exploration.
He stepped in to serve as Chairman of the Vendors Corner Committee when the previous Chairman became the Finance Committee Chairman.
Paul has served the society as Vice-President, Director, Membership Committee Chairman and AAPG Delegate.
The Vendors Corner Committee has been quite active this fiscal year. Paul has proactively sought vendors to attend the dinner meetings each month. He has arranged for or set up 23 vendors (through March 15) at the General, International and North American dinner meetings. This is nearly double last year’s number and exceeds numbers from previous years. The money from Vendors Corner sponsors goes to the North Harris College Geoscience Technology Training Center and our undergraduate scholarship foundation.
In addition to his work on the Vendors Corner Committee, Paul serves on the Outreach Committee and also recently edited the 17th edition of the HGS “Directory of Oil Company Name Changes,” which was made available at the AAPG Convention this April. Paul has a BS in geology from the State University of New York - Cortland and 30 years’ experience in the oil & gas industry. He is a Licensed Professional Geologist in the State of Texas. He is a member of AAPG, RMAG, Houston Producers’ Forum, and Onshore Exploration Independents and is an affiliate member of SIPES. Before coming to Peoples Energy Production Company, he worked for a variety of companies, the most recent being Burlington Resources, where he served as Chief Geologist – North America, Exploration Manager and Vice President – New Ventures.
The HGS Board acknowledges and thanks Paul for his spirit of volunteerism, dedication and work for the Houston Geological Society.
Click here to read May Bulletin
Technical Meetings
13 HGS General Dinner Meeting
Lower Tertiary Deposition in Walker Ridge, Gulf of
Mexico: An Example of Sedimentary Distribution in
an Unrestricted Basin
15 HGS International Explorationists Dinner Meeting
Deepwater Nigeria Play Characterization
17 HGS Northsiders Luncheon Meeting
Rock Physics,Well Logs and Reservoir Geophysics:
Gulf Coast and Gulf of Mexico
21 HGS Environmental and Engineering Dinner Meeting
Impacts of Sand and Gravel Mining on Physical
Habitat of the Colorado River and Tributaries,
Central Texas
23 SIPES Luncheon Meeting
The Maverick Basin: New Technology—New Success
25 GSH Potential Fields Group Dinner Meeting
An Interpretation of the Crustal Framework and
Continent-Oceanic Boundary in U.S. OCS of the
Gulf of Mexico, Based on Gravity and Refraction
Data Analysis
27 HGS North American Explorationists Dinner Meeting
A Dynamic Model for the Permian Panhandle and
Hugoton Fields,Western Anadarko Basin
29 HGS General Luncheon Meeting
Tectono-Stratigraphic History of Greater Mississippi
Canyon, U.S. Gulf of Mexico
Other Features
35 Photo Contest
39 Guest Night Deep Sea Sediment Cores Reveal Geological Evidence
of Long-Term Global Climate Change by Linda Sternbach and Bill Osten
47 2005–2006 Outstanding Student Awards
51 Book Review: State of Fear
by Bill Rizer
54 Volunteer of the Month
55 Government Update by Henry M.Wise and Arlin Howles
58 Treasurer-Elect Candidate Addendum
Bonnie Milne-Andrews Volunteer with the HGS International Explorationists Group Bonnie stepped to the role of the International Explorationists’ Group technical program chairman in January 2006, taking over for Ian Poyntz, who had successfully organized the International Group’s program for almost 2 years. She works for Swift Energy International in north Houston as a key member of their New Ventures/ International exploration team. Before joining Swift Energy, Bonnie spent 20 years as a geologist with Amoco Corporation, and later worked with Schlumberger’s NExT group. She brings the HGS International group over 25 years of industry experience, having worked challenging project areas in North America, Qatar, Gabon, Bolivia, Argentina, Russia, Kazakhstan, New Zealand and Australia. A lot of Houston geologists know Bonnie as a member of the AAPG House of Delegates, (Houston chapter) and for helping the AAPG organization. She is chairman for the Career Center activities of the upcoming April AAPG 2006 Annual Convention in Houston. All this international experience is far away from her start in the oil industry which began when she graduated with a Master of Science degree in geology from the University of Iowa. She remains active as a member of the Geological Alumni Advisory Board at her alma mater, is married to Houston attorney Jim Andrews and is also a proud Mom to George Caracostis, a freshman at Texas State University.
HGS Hosts the 2006 AAPG Conventionby HGS President Dave Rensink
This is the month the Houston Geological Society hosts theannual AAPG convention—April 9th through the 12th. This is the eleventh time Houston has hosted the AAPG convention, and it is the first convention held in Houston during an oil boom since 1979. Charles Sternbach and his organizing committee deserve our thanks and congratulations for assuming such a tremendous responsibility, and executing it so effectively. Many HGS members have put in thousands of hours over the past two years to make this convention a success for AAPG and HGS. Thank you all for your considerable efforts and dedication.The theme for this convention is “Perfecting the search, Delivering on promises.” It reflects the current state of our industry where efficiency and accountability are not only desirable qualities but essential in an era when target sizes are getting smaller and innovation is required to bring oil supplies to market economically. Relatively high product prices can cover a lot of inefficiency for a short period of time, but drilling and production costs inevitably rise in response to higher prices with the inevitable result of the reduction of profit margins. Efficiency and the ability to produce relatively predictable results will never be out of vogue. They are as vital during a boom as they are during a period of low product prices. Whether involved in exploration or exploitation, geoscientists add corporate value through drilling, and finding and development cost on a dollar per barrel equivalent basis is one of the most commonly used measures of our success. Needless to say, efficiency in drilling and production operations weighs heavily in the calculation of finding and development costs, but so does our ability to deliver statistically predictable quantities of oil and gas. Success in the oil and gas business does not come from geologic competence alone. You also need to understand how what you do affects the ability of the allied disciplines to work effectively and your influence on the corporate bottom line. If you are only in it for the science, someone else is helping to pay your salary.Bob Merrill and his committee chairs have assembled a range oftechnical talks in keeping with the convention’s theme. The session topics range from effective business strategies to emerging plays and to the effective exploitation of existing resources. There are also forums on the history of petroleum geology, the challenges for the oil business during the 21st century, funding exploration and development projects, and the successes and limits of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy. There is also a forum titled “Women as leaders in the E&P industry.” This is by no means an exhaustive list of the technical sessions and forums. Check the program for the technical sessions and forums of the greatest interest to you. The technical program is the foundation of any annual convention, and this year will be no different.HGS is also sponsoring an evening at Landry’s Downtown Aquarium. All of the facilities of the aquarium and midway will be at your disposal for the evening. Because HGS is sponsoring this event, you do not need to register for the convention to participate in this event. However, you do need to register for this event through the AAPG convention web site. Do not try to register through the HGS web site or by calling the HGS office—all they can do is to refer you to the AAPG web site. If you have not already registered for the convention, you can register on site at the George R. Brown Convention Center for either single day or full convention registration.
In the event that you have not been directly involved in staging the convention, you can still help. Mac McKinney needs volunteers to help staff the HGS booth in the exhibit hall during the convention. You do not need to call or email him, just show up at the booth during the ice breaker Sunday evening or Monday morning and sign up on the duty roster.
This year’s convention should prove to be a greatopportunity for Certainly the AAPG convention will be the highlight of April, but technical rejuvenation and networking. A successful convention do not forget that we have a joint lunch meeting with GSH on benefits you, AAPG, and HGS. I hope to see you there on April 18th and the North American Explorationists have scheduled a talk on the north slope of Alaska for April 24th.
Technical Meetings
13 Joint GSH/HGS Luncheon Meeting
Uses, Abuses and Examples of Seismic-Derived
Acoustic Impedance Data:What Does the Interpreter
Need to Know?
17 SIPES Luncheon Meeting
Seismic/Sequence Stratigraphy—Applications
for the 21st Century
19 HGS North American Explorationists
Dinner Meeting
Recent Exploration on the North Slope of Alaska
Other Features
15 Volunteer of the Month
21 AAPG Annual Meeting
by Charles A. Sternbach
22 AAPG Forums and Special Lectures
31 AAPG Technical Program
32 AAPG Luncheons
42 Candidates for the 2006–2007 Executive Board
51 Warren L. and Florence W. Calvert Memorial
Scholarship Fund
53 Book Review: Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation
for Profits, Jobs, and Security
by Craig M. Dingler
55 Book Review: Snowball Earth: The Story of the Great
Catastrophe that Spawned Life as We Know It
by George O. Chandlee
58 Government Update
by Henry M.Wise and Arlin Howles
62 Remembrances
Click here to download a copy of the April 2006 Bulletin
About the ODP Drilling Program
We asked Jeff Fox about the history of the Ocean Drilling Program and he referred us to several websites and written summaries of the drilling program. Basically, it all began in 1961, with "Project Mohole" which unsuccessfully attempted to drill to the mantle in 11,700 ft of water with a record 29,860 ft of drill string off the coast of Baja California, Mexico. (reference: Horton, EE, "Preliminary Drilling Phase of Mohole Project 1" AAPG Bulletin 45, no 11, Nov 1961 pages 1789-1992.) The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) began in 1968, using the Glomar Challenger drillship. The DSDP project is famous for the information it provided on the study of the Gulf of Mexico seafloor. The first mission in August 1968, drilled in Sigsbee Knoll, GOM, and found a shallow salt dome with oil shows, a discovery quickly noted by the oil and gas exploration community.
The DSDP program was originally funded by the U.S., but in 1976, expanded to include scientists from other countries including France, Japan, the Soviet Union, the UK and West Germany. In 1974, on DSDP Leg 39, drilling found core evidence of the Earth’s 24,000 year processional cycle and opened up the study of long term global climate change. Other achievements of DSDP program include the DSDP Leg 60- drilling of the Mariana Trench, Pacific Ocean, in 23,079 ft of water, and recovering a core of gas hydrate of the Coast of Costa Rica in 1982.
In 1985, the scientific deep ocean drilling program entered a new technological stage when the Glomar Challenger was replaced by the drillship JOIDES Resolution, and the program was placed inside an multinational organization called managed by JOI (Joint Oceanographic Institutions, composed of 18 U.S. organizations). JOIDES stands for Joint Oceanographic institutions for Deep Earth Sampling. The JOIDES Resolution is a converted oil and gas drillship that has seven floors of onboard laboratories to sample and examine and test deep sea cores. The drillship can house up to 50 scientists and 65 crew members. The Resolution both stores cores and contains geophysical equipment that studies the earth’s magnetic record, and seafloor topography.
The 20-plus year-old JOIDES Resolution ship was upgraded in 2003, and is still undergoing renovations to upgrade its capabilities and enable it to continue coring until about 2013. The next step in the IODP drilling program is the introduction of a new drillship, the Japanese ship Chikyu, which will be flexible enough to drill in 13,000 ft using a riser, and 39,000 ft of water without using a riser (see explanation below). The Chikyu could start operations in a few years, but is not ready for expeditions now. One area of research the Japanese vessel will concentrate on is seismically active zones. The program will place permanent monitors to track tilt, strain, and stress in Pacific earthquake zones. Key nations that support the research include Japan, Australia, Canada, Korea, and European nations including France, Germany, the UK and Iceland. Fox said in an interview that more nations want to enter the scientific alliance: particularly India, Brazil, and Russia. There are a few areas of the world the IODP would like to expand coring programs, like the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, S. Vietnam, Philippines and the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, but political problems have intervened.