The Wise Report Provides Government Updates for Areas of Interest to HGS Professionals.
Check out the Latest Wise Reports below...
Release Date: 31 July 2010
Release Date: 24 July 2010
Release Date: 17 July 2010
Release Date: 17 July 2010
Release Date: 10 July 2010
Release Date: 25 June 2010
Release Date: 9 June 2010
Release Date: 9 June 2010
Release Date: 3 June 2010
Release Date: 28 May 2010
Release Date: 26 May 2010
Release Date: 21 May 2010
Release Date: 19 May 2010
Release Date: 12 May 2010
Release Date: 12 May 2010
Release Date: 7 May 2010
Release Date: 30 April 2010
Release Date: 25 April 2010
Release Date: 18 April 2010
Release Date: 12 April 2010
Release Date: 12 April 2010
Release Date: 11 April 2010
Release Date: 4 April 2010
Release Date: 1 April 2010
Release Date: 31 March 2010
Release Date: 26 March 2010
Release Date: 16 March 2010
Release Date: 15 March 2010
Release Date: 15 March 2010
Release Date: 2 March 2010
The Houston Geological Society is powered by a community that cares.
Your donation supports students, technical programs, outreach, and the partnerships that strengthen our geoscience community. If HGS has helped you learn or connect, please consider giving back
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
July 31, 2010
The TCEQ has updated the TPH spreadsheet for calculating TRRP PCLs and is available at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/trrp/trrppcls.html. The new version corrects an error in duplicating a PCL number to the Results Page from the AirSOILInh Calculation Page.
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The Wise Report
7/31/2010
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
July 24, 2010
Lieutenant Colonel Michael Hess returned to Austin in July from a four-year tour of duty to resume his position as Executive Director of the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists. Colonel Hess had been recalled to the United States Army in July of 2006, where he had initially been stationed in Iraq.
Mr. Charles Horton, who has been serving as Interim Executive Director since January 1, 2009, will continue to assist in agency operations as he takes over as Deputy Executive Director. About the upcoming changes, Mr. Horton states, “I look forward to working with Colonel Hess as we go forward. We will do whatever it takes to make the transition seamless, to tackle the important issues facing the agency, and to be fully prepared for the upcoming legislative session.”
Thanks for your service, Colonel Hess, and welcome back!
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
7/24/2010
HGS is the host Society
for the next AAPG Convention and Exhibition,
April 10-13 2011 at the
George R. Brown Convention Center
Attendance at the last AAPG in Houston in 2006 was a record 8300 people.
HGS is working hard to launch the next big convention ; the sky is the limit!
This upcoming 2011 convention celebrates “Making the Next Giant Leap in Geosciences” as the slogan, marking the 50 th anniversary of the launch of the Moon shot program, initiated by JFK here in Houston in 1962. Steve Levine (ConocoPhillips) is the 2011 General Convention Chairman; he served as HGS President 2004-2005.
The call for submission of oral papers and posters is live now at www.aapg.org/houston2011.
The deadline to submit a paper is September 23, 2010. Use the online website at http://aapg2011ace.abstractcentral.com
The abstract site is set up so that presenters will choose a theme after entering user name and password and entering text. Abstracts are limited to 2500 characters.
Here are the eleven themes for the Houston 2011 convention:
Theme 1: Molecules to Marketplace: the Business of Energy
Chair: Jeff Lund (Corridor Resources)
Theme 2: Global Deepwater Reservoirs: Giant Leaps in E&P
Chair: Art Donovan (BP)
Theme3: Worldwide E&P: Opportunities of the New Decade
Chair: Robin Hamilton (Shell)
Theme 4: Challenged Resource Frontiers
CoChairs: Keith Shanley and Kevin Bohacs (ExxonMobil)
Theme 5: Mudstones and Shales: Unlocking the Promise
Chair: Dan Jarvie
Theme 6: Siliciclastics: Advancing Research to Resource
Chair: Janok Bhattacharya (U of H)
Theme 7: Insight into Carbonates and Evaporites
Chair: Steve Bachtel (Chevron)
Theme 8: Breakthroughs: Tectonics, Salt and Basin Analysis
Chair: Martin Perlmutter (Chevron)
Theme 9: Integrating New Technology, Geophysics
and Subsurface Data -- Chair: R. Randy Ray
Theme 10: Energy and Environmental Horizons
Chair: Anthony Gorody
Theme 11: The Next Geo-Generation: Who, What , Where?
Chair: Denise Butler (Shell)
For Technical Program questions, contact:
Linda Sternbach, linda.sternbach@gmail.com, 281-679-7333
Carl Steffensen, Carl.Steffensen@bp.com, 281 366 0809
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
July 17, 2010
Matt Cowan, with Lone Star Environmental informs me that recent instructions from the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulations, and Enforcement (BOEMRE), following the loss of subsurface control of the Deepwater Horizon incident, will require that a Professional Engineer certify all well casing designs and cementing program/procedures for the purpose of which it is intended under expected wellbore conditions. (NTL No. 2010 - N05 Increased Safety Measures for Energy Development on the OCS Effective Date: June 8, 2010). Additional information can be found at: http://www.aade.org/PECensus/PE%20Census%20Determination%20Letter.pdf
The Tesas Board of Professional Geoscientists (TBPG) proposes the amendments, repeals and new rules to reorganize, specify and clarify the requirements for examination and licensure, firm registration and certification as a Geoscientist-in-Training, clarify the application procedures, clarify the distinction between the license and the license certificate, clarify license, registration, and certification renewal requirements and procedures, define the role of the authorized official of a firm, strengthen the professional code of conduct and apply relevant portions of it to registered firms, the authorized official of a firm, and Geoscientists-in-Training, clarify complaint procedures and the actions the TBPG may impose on a Professional Geoscientist, a registered firm, an authorized official of a firm, a Geoscientist-in-Training, an unlicensed individual and an unregistered firm, correct minor errors, improve the definitions and rules, and ensure that the rules reflect current legal, policy, and operational considerations. This set of proposed revisions is a result of the review of the entire chapter in accordance with the Texas Government Code §2001.039. This is an extensive revision and the details can be found at: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/texreg/sos/PROPOSED/22.EXAMINING%20BOARDS.html#161
Comments on this proposal may be submitted in writing either in person or by courier to Molly Roman, Operations Manager, Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists, 333 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas 78701 or by mail to P.O. Box 13225, Austin, Texas 78711 or by e-mail to mroman@tbpg.state.tx.us. When e-mailing comments, please indicate "Comments on Proposed Rules" in the e-mail subject line. Comments will be accepted for 30 days.
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The Wise Report
7/17/2010
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
July 10, 2010
Matt Cowan, with Lone Star Environmental, informed me that the state of Louisiana has passed legislation to register geologists practicing in Louisiana. Their PG board has yet to be set up, so there are currently no forms or rules set up, but the act is to take effect January 1, 2011. The grandfather period will end January 1, 2012. The legislation can be found at
http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=720117 and appears to be similar to the Texas PG act.
The Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists (TBPG) proposes amendments to §§850.10, 850.60 - 850.63, 850.81, and 850.82, concerning the licensure and regulation of Professional Geoscientists to correct minor errors, improve the rules, and ensure that the rules reflect current legal, policy, and operational considerations. This set of proposed revisions is a result of the review of the entire chapter.
An amendment to the title of Subchapter A is proposed to rename the subchapter to Authority and Definitions. Amendments to §850.10 are proposed to improve the definitions of Act and rule; add definitions for advisory opinion, Board, licensee, and sanction; to delete the definitions of address of record, applicant, Chairman, Vice-Chairman, complainant, hearings examiner, examiner, administrative law judge, pleading, respondent, T.R.C.P., and U.S.P.S.; and to renumber the definitions accordingly.
An amendment to the title of Subchapter B is proposed to rename the subchapter to Organization and Responsibilities.
Amendments to §850.60 are proposed to rename the title of the section to Organization and Responsibilities of the Board - General Provisions; add a statement that the purpose of this chapter is to implement the provisions in the Texas Geoscience Practice Act (the Act), Texas Occupations Code Chapter 1002, concerning the licensure of Professional Geoscientists and regulation of the public practice of geoscience; and to reletter the section accordingly.
Amendments to §850.61 are proposed to rename the title of the section to Organization and Responsibilities of the Board - Meetings and to delete the specific revised date of Robert's Rules of Order.
Amendments to §850.62 are proposed to clarify the Board's duties of ensuring that unless exempted by the Texas Occupations Code Chapter 1002, a person may not use the Professional Geoscientist title or initials or represent that a person is qualified to engage in the public practice of geoscience and that a person does not take responsible charge of certain geoscientific reports or portions of reports unless the person is licensed under the authority provided to the Board under the Act; to clarify that the Act and rules adopted by the Board under the authority of the Act apply to every licensee, registered firm, Geoscientist-in-Training, and unlicensed individual or unregistered firm providing or offering to provide public geoscience services; to clarify that unless an exemption applies, the Board ensures that all firms offering to engage or engaging in the public practice of professional geoscience in Texas are registered as a Geoscience Firm; to provide that an individual meeting certain criteria who expresses an intent to become a licensed Professional Geoscientist may register with the Board as a Geoscientist-in-Training (GIT); to remove the subsections stating that complaints can be filed with the Board and that a complaint must be filed within two years of the event giving rise to the complaint. These items are addressed in Chapter 851 (relating to Texas Board of Geoscientists Licensing Rules). This section will be relettered accordingly.
Amendments to §850.63 are proposed to provide that a notice of its order imposing a sanction or penalty must include the specific disciplinary action to be taken, in addition to previously existing requirements and to remove the provision that upon request, exams may be offered in a foreign language at the expense of the requestor.
An amendment to §850.81 is proposed to update that the cost for providing public information is that as promulgated by the Office of the Attorney General.
An amendment to §850.82 is proposed to provide that the Executive Director shall determine the agency's position on disputes regarding issues with the processing of a drawn payment.
The text of these amendments can be found at: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/texreg/sos/PROPOSED/22.EXAMINING%20BOARDS.html#86. Comments on the proposal may be submitted in writing either in person or by courier to Molly Roman, Operations Manager, Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists, 333 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas 78711, by mail at P.O. Box 13225, Austin, Texas 78701, or by e-mail to mroman@tbpg.state.tx.us. When e-mailing comments, please indicate "Comments on Proposed Rules" in the e-mail subject line. Comments
The Wise Report Henry M. Wise, P.G. June 25, 2010
The Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists (TBPG) has filed this notice of intent to review and consider for readoption, amendment, or repeal 22 TAC Chapters 850 and 851, as follows:
Chapter 850 Subchapter A (Authority and Responsibilities)
Subchapter B (Organization)
Subchapter C (Fees)
Subchapter D (Advisory Opinions)
Chapter 851
Subchapter A (Licensing)
Subchapter B (Code of Professional Conduct)
Subchapter C (Compliance and Enforcement)
Subchapter D (Hearings--Contested Cases)
The TBPG will determine whether the reasons for adopting the sections under review continue to exist. Any changes to the sections proposed as a result of this rule review will be published in the Proposed Rules section of the Texas Register.
Written comments relating to this rule review will be accepted for a 30-day period following publication of this notice in the Texas Register. Comments should be directed to Molly Roman, Operations Manager, Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists, P.O. Box 13225, Austin, Texas 78711, or by e-mail to mroman@tbpg.state.tx.us.
The Wise ReportHenry M. Wise, P.G.
6/25/2010
It Takes More Than an Editor to Make a Bulletin
This is my tenth column, but not my last. I will have ten more opportunities to share my thoughts with you beginning in September. As we close this volume of the Bulletin I thought that it was an appropriate time to look back and to thank a number of people.
Let me begin by stating that I took on the role of Editor a little earlier than expected. Although I had a vision as to how I had hoped the Bulletin would develop under my tenure, there was little, actually no, time to implement this vision. I was simply too busy learning how to get this job done while working within tight deadlines, with printing and mailing schedules dictating how and when things were to be completed. Maybe the summer hiatus in the Bulletin will provide me the time cushion that I have been hoping for.
As I have stated in the past, these deadlines have also resulted in some errors within the Bulletin, which I acknowledged and accepted responsibility for. There have also been a number of compliments about the Bulletin, in general, and for some of the columns that I have prepared. When all is said and done, I believe this was a successful year for the Bulletin and I remain honored to have been asked to serve as Editor.
The Bulletin is not the product of a single individual, but the product of all those who provided content. There is a long list of authors that provided the technical contents for our various monthly meetings. A number of members have gathered and forwarded content while working within tight deadlines. These individuals are Art Donovan, Matthew Cowan, Steve Getz, Jory Pacht, Justin Vanden Brink, and David Tonner. In addition to HGS’s President Gary Colburn, and myself there are a few monthly contributors that I would like to thank – Arlin Howles, Winona LaBrant Smith, and Henry Wise.
There is yet another group that is critical to the Bulletin that I need to recognize. My Advisory Editors, James Ragsdale and Charles Revilla, have read and commented on nearly every submission. Their comments have helped bring sharpness, focus, and clarity to the various abstracts, technical notes, and news items. Lilly Hargrave, in the HGS office, handles the Bulletin’s advertising. This advertising is critical to the Bulletin permitting such things as the use of color and the occasional increase in the number of pages. HGS appreciates all of our advertisers for their continued support. The design and layout of each Bulletin is not a simple task. Lisa Krueger has provided us with that professional “look” that we expect the Bulletin to maintain. She has also helped me learn how the Bulletin is produced and has provided me with a corporate memory.
Last but not least, I must thank my wife Terry. When talking about Terry, I really don’t know where to begin. I probably should start with her tolerance and willingness to share my time with HGS. My job as Editor has largely been accomplished on her time, at our kitchen table. She is also my consigliere, serving as a sounding board when a decision needs to be made. She is also my editor. She and she alone, reviews my monthly column. Her critiques, which at times have changed the tone, emphasis, and length of my columns, and have always improved their quality, are appreciated beyond words. For these things and for so much more, I thank her.
Enjoy your summer and thank you for taking the time to read and occasionally comment on my columns. As always, I look forward to receiving your thoughts, suggestions, comments, and criticisms.
Until next time…
The Year Has Gone By All Too Quickly.
This is it! My final President’s Column! What a year we have had! The technical program has been superb and well attended, thanks to Vice President Art Donovan and all the technical chairs and committees. Frank Walles and the Mudstone Group put on a tremendous Mudstone Conference which completely sold out ….again! The Board of Directors worked hard throughout this year to restructure the internal workings of the HGS. Their work, while not very visible or exciting to the membership, has resulted in an organization that functions much more smoothly and with greater efficiency and accountability. The HGS had become large enough that it had to be reorganized and run in a more businesslike and professional manner. I believe this puts the HGS in a position to concentrate now on programs and courses which will better benefit our members. This will enable us to grow as well as handle upcoming AAPG Conventions. Speaking of the upcoming 2011 AAPG Convention to be held here in Houston, we are going to need a lot of member volunteers. Students are welcome to volunteer as well. It is a great chance to network. To find out what you can do, please contact Linda Sternbach at linda.sternbach@gmail.com or our volunteer coordinator, Sue Pritchett, at pritchettsue@gmail.com. They will be able to get you in the right group.
The AAPG Convention in New Orleans was very well attended and sponsorships by some of the big companies were back after their notable absence last year. That really was a good thing. Many good technical talks were given on the exhibit floor this year. These were quite well attended. Of particular note was Statoil’s 3D visualization presentation. That was just too cool to a diehard geek like me! The technical talks were very good this year. We have a lot to live up to next year. And congratulations are due to the New Orleans Geological Society for a successful convention.
One of the more memorable talks I attended was the presentation on Davy Jones by Jim Bob Moffet (co-founder and CEO of McMoran). Davy Jones is McMoran’s SMI Block 230 Wilcox discovery. This well found 24% porosity Wilcox sands at depths greater than 27,300’ TVDss. The data from this well will make it geologically one of the most important wells since Mahogany. This well, along with Flat Rock and Blackbeard, has the potential to redefine the shelf in the GOM. Yes, it is deep and expensive, but if drilling in the GOM has taught us anything it is that drilling technology grows exponentially with each discovery. Costs and time to drill these wells will inevitably be greatly reduced as knowledge and technology increases. The fact that this well was ever drilled in the first place is a tribute to a geologist with the vision and the fortitude to see it through. Mr. Moffett is, of course, the geologist of whom I speak. Many may not realize that while he has gathered an excellent geosciences team around him, he is an outstanding geologist in his own right. It is this combination of geologic expertise and vision combined with the ability to actually make a decision that allowed Davy Jones to be drilled. It is the difference between a company with a leader who understands exploration, geology, and risk versus a company controlled by a CPA or a lawyer. It is the difference between a company whose main interest is in short-term stock price gains and a company that pursues true long-term growth, which for an exploration company comes from bold, deliberate exploration. Companies who evaluate risk by canned programs and statistics will NEVER find anything truly new and significant. After all, drilling by the statistics will not allow you to find anything that hasn’t been found before. Hopefully other CEOs are taking notice and will turn once again to their geologists for bold new ideas and actually listen to them. After all, it is this group that is responsible for making them an E&P company in the first place!
Thank you for allowing me to serve as HGS President this past year. It has been an experience for which I will always be grateful. I want to thank everyone who volunteered for making this an excellent year for the HGS. I wish everyone a great summer and success in all you do. Just remember, Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
Fortune favors the bold!
Happy Hunting!
Click here to download PDF of Feb. 2010 Bulletin (low res)
Guest Night returned to the Houston Museum of Natural Science this year and was a fantastic event for HGS members and their families and friends. After dining with the dinosaurs and minerals inside the Museum, the capacity crowd learned about the geology of Big Bend National Park from Dr. Patricia Wood Dickerson, of the Jackson School of Geosciences, UT Austin. Her talk was entitled, “Big Bend -- Where the Rockies Meet the Appalachians -- Discoveries and Enigmas.” She described the geology of Big Bend, which includes Paleozoic to Tertiary rocks, as basically unexplored in many areas, with few landing sites, much like the Apollo exploration of the moon. She talked about the oldest rocks, the Ordovician, and described how reconstruction of plate tectonics reunited Big Bend with South America during the Ordovician. She showed satellite and outcrop photos of puzzling volcanic features known to have deformed the landscape of Big Bend during the Tertiary, 30 million years ago.
Don Cormick, Big Bend geologist, usually stationed in Big Bend National park, was on hand in person at Guest Night, handing out park information. Big Bend Park, run by the Department of the Interior, has a website for interested people at www.nps.gov/bibe. The park phone number is 432-477-2251 for people planning to visiting.
The audience packed the HMNS IMAX theatre for Dr. Dickerson’s talk, and stayed for a special IMAX movie called “3D Arabia” which showed a young film maker from Saudi Arabia’s documentation of present day Bedouins and the trade of frankincense spice in the Middle Ages. The movie showed present-day Muslim worship in Mecca, Riyadh and sites and towns inside Saudi Arabia.
IMAX Theater audience
Bill Osten (event organiser) and Charles Sternbach (pictures captioned left to right)
Bonnie Milne-Andrews and Robert Killian
Dan Tearpock and Diana Poon
Dave and Janet Meaux
Dave Reynolds
Don Cormick, Geologist at Big Bend
Donna and Tom Riley
Erna and Charles Revilla
Jim Ragsdale and Sandi Barber
Joseph (c) and Sandra Babcock
Kelley and Mike Deming
Selim Shaker and George Klein
Steve Earle and Pat Dickerson (Guest Night Speaker)
Beth Beall and company
Mastodon skeletons in the HMNS hall
2010/2011 HGS Officer Election
President John Tubb
President-Elect Steve Earle
Vice-President Amy Sullivan
Secretary Cecelia Baum
Treasurer David Meaux
Treasurer-Elect Christina Higginbotham
Editor-Elect Ron Waszczak
Director John Adamick
Director Jennifer Burton
Continuing Director Robert Pledger
Continuing Director Tarek Ghazi
The Wise Report
May 21, 2010
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The TRRP 13 TRRP guidance for Review and Reporting of COC Concentration Data has been updated. Some of the major changes are:
The regulatory guidance document can be found at: http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/comm_exec/forms_pubs/pubs/rg/rg-366_trrp_13.htm.
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The Wise Report
May 21, 2010
Exploring for hydrocarbon in deep water since the early 1970s has considerably changed the seismic acquisition, drilling and production practices. It requires floating drilling rigs, rather than the fixed jack ups which were used on the shelf since the late 1940s and are still in use today.
The most common drilling challenges in the deep water were limited to Loss of Circulation (LOC) and Shallow Water Flow (SWF). The LOC and SWF caused drilling hurdles resulting in high costs to test a prospect and sometimes led to the abandonment of the well. High pressure in the deeper subsurface formations that are being drilled today has emerged as a new challenge.
The decade from 1969 to 1979 witnessed three massive spills from offshore oil wells around the world: the IXTOC 1 spill off Mexico in 1979, the Ekofisk spill in the North Sea in 1977, and the 1969 spill off the coast of Santa Barbara. On April 20, 2010, a loss of well control occurred and resulted in an explosion and fire on the Offshore Drilling Unit Deepwater Horizon. Eleven lives were lost in this incident, the rig subsequently sank, and the resulting release of oil has been declared a spill of national significance with oil threatening sensitive coastlines and resources in the Gulf of Mexico. Current information indicates that a high pressure hydrocarbon reservoir is the main cause of this tragedy. The BOP, as a last resort in a sequence of preventative measures, did not function in response to an unexpected pressure surge.
The behavior of the subsurface geopressure profile is driven by subsea water depth, sedimentation rate, lithology, stratigraphy, structural setting, and stresses. In deep water, stress reduction due to subsea water depth is the main cause of the narrow Drilling Tolerance Window (DTW). This leads to a limited maneuverability to control the formation pressure using mud weight pressure. Mud pressure is the first line of defense to combat bore- hole’s flow, well kicks, gas infusion, and blowout. The Blowout Preventer (BOP) is built and designed, as the last line of defense, to control the hard kick of an unexpected pressure.
There are many schools of thoughts explaining the causes of abnormal pressures and the techniques to detect pressures changes in subsurface. We know pore pressure progresses with depth. In the deep water there are four zones. They are from the top to the bottom: (1) the shallow free flow, (2)hydrodynamic, (3) transition, and (4) geopressured zones. Each zone is characterized by a pressure gradient dictated by lithology and stress. Some of the drilling problems in the upper two zones are SWF, LOC and the presence of hydrates. Riseless drilling was developed to tolerate the mud pressure that is needed to stay within the DTW and reduce the number of casing seats to reach exploration objectives.
In the lower two zones, pressure exponentially accelerates in the shale (Seals) and becomes hydrostatic in the sand beds (Reservoirs). The excess pressure created by compartmentalization between the shale and sand is usually amplified by the presence of hydrocarbon. Drilling the interface between shale seal and pay sand is the most troublesome drilling zone. Hard kicks, mud cuts, well flow, and blowouts are common at the seal-reservoir boundary and well prognoses should account for that.
Before drilling, seismic velocity, offset wells and modeling are used to predict pore-pressure. Calibration of the model should be performed while drilling. Failure to incorporate the geological setting, structural pattern, and the expected hydrocarbon column height can lead to faltering well prognoses and unforeseen events.
There are several lines of defense that should be employed before relying on the BOP.
Before Drilling:
During Drilling:
Casing seats and cementing:
In the recent event, it seems that the bottom cementing plug was not able to hold the formation pressure, especially with the presence of hydrocarbon. At this point the hydrocarbon gushed out through the casing to the drilling ship.
Reliance on the BOP without careful and diligent use of additional lines of defense, such as those listed above, may result in other catastrophic events in deep water exploration.
The Editor’s Travels –What Happens on the Road
As I was sitting in the domestic departure lounge of the Perth Airport, I decided that my location was the key for this month’s editorial. An essay began to flow on some of the exciting things that have happened to me as I have traveled around the globe.
The international character of the industry has resulted in many of us traveling to some rather exotic or obscure locations. Last year I joined Continental Airline’s Million Mile Club! When I was growing up, I thought traveling across a state-line was a big deal and I never thought that I would visit six of the seven continents. For many people travel to exotic and even not so exotic locations is exciting. After 30 years the excitement is gone and it is just part of the job. But these travels have yielded a number of great travel stories, many of which might be difficult to believe even if you were there. For the fun of it, I would like to share a few stories. And, because they impact me and largely me alone unlike Vegas, “what happened in Perth, Moscow, and Antalya needn’t stay in Australia, Russia, or Turkey”.
Let me begin with my latest trip to Perth. I had just finished a day in the office, after having another poor night’s sleep in a hotel room. As I started back to my hotel to pick-up my luggage and head to the airport the sky opened-up and a major series of storms hit Perth. Although I had an umbrella the strong winds made it useless. After getting back to the hotel I changed into some dry clothes and attempted to grab a cab. It took about two hours to ‘grab’ one. Upon arrival at the airport I found that the airport had closed! Authorities needed to determine if the building was safe after part of the roof collapsed and was sitting in the middle of the baggage area. When the airport reopened I was required to check my carry-on. I continued onto security, the gate, and then the plane. After 30 minutes the pilot announced that a problem existed. Ninety minutes later we were asked to deplane while they attempted to make a repair. A miracle, a replacement plane was found, but it took some time to prepare and I finally departed for Sydney six hours late and missed the first half day of my meeting.
A frightening experience happened on a trip home from Moscow. Our group arrived at the airport and began the check-in process. While I was receiving my boarding pass, my brief case seemed to be of interest. I was asked a few questions, such as how long did I have the briefcase and who bought it for me. I answered the questions and moved on. Then as we began boarding the plane, a very large gentleman placed his hand on my shoulder and motioned me to come with him. He spoke no English and I spoke no Russian. He just kept repeating not KGB. After having my brief case pulled apart and half of the clothes I was wearing removed, I was allowed to board the plane. No explanation or apology was given. It turned out that six of us on that 747 underwent this treatment. After arriving at JFK, and checking in for the Houston flight, the searches began once more. This time I did speak the language and in my best ‘New York’ I asked what was going on. It turned out to be the brief case. A bomb threat had been phoned in warning that a passenger with a brown hard shell brief case was carrying a bomb. I was permitted to board after allowing another detailed search. Needless to say, I no longer carry that brief case.
My classic travel story is associated with my field work in southern Turkey. The three week program began with a flight to New York. All went well. We arrived only a few minutes late after holding at the gate for a few passengers making a connection. I switched terminals to find that my flight to Paris was delayed because of a toilet problem. No, you wouldn’t want to be on a transatlantic flight without a working toilet. While waiting I was paged; the airline staff needed to re-route me because I was going to miss my connection in Paris. After being sent to a new gate, I was informed that my luggage was missing and would not make the transfer. I boarded my plane knowing that my luggage and I had different travel plans. I headed to Geneva, Zurich, Istanbul, and then finally Antalya. I grabbed the last cab and showed the driver a note with my hotel’s name. After about ten minutes of driving the cab died, and I helped to push it into a gas station. An attendant at the station actually finally drove me to my hotel. The next day the hotel staff neglected to tell me that the remainder of my field team was going to be late, so I spent much of the day in the hotel lobby just waiting. I explained my lack of clothes to my associates when they arrived and we went shopping, which is a story unto itself. At this point I was hoping that the ‘excitement’ was over. Unfortunately, where Barry goes ‘excitement’ seems to follow. As our team was driving to our next field location, down an isolated highway, a car passed us, pulled off the road and signaled us to stop. We did. There was concern that something might have fallen off of the roof of the jeep. A woman ran to our car, opened the door and jumped into the backseat. By the time we got her out, a matter of a few seconds, she had managed to pick my pocket. Luckily, the remainder of the two weeks was largely uneventful, except for the usual flat tires and overheated radiator. But a legend grew after I put in my expense account, which included my new clothes and the money lost from my wallet. I gained the reputation for having the nerve to have the company pay for a woman that I picked up on the road and spent a few minutes with in the backseat of a jeep! Remember my luggage? We were re-united about six weeks later when another airline called, asking if I had lost some luggage. A suitcase with my contact information was found sitting in Paris. Apparently my suitcase had toured Europe!
So the next time someone comments on the exciting travels that a geologist must have, remember not everything that is exciting is enjoyable. But then again when I am on vacation I do travel – by sea!
Until next time…
Persistence is Essential, Never Give Up
It is May and summer is upon us once again. Take advantage of the weather and get in a little golf or bike riding now! In July you won’t want to get out of the pool! The AAPG Convention is past and we are already planning the 2011 AAPG Convention. As I am sure you are aware, the 2011 AAPG Convention is in Houston, hosted by none other than the HGS … in other words you! We are going to need a lot of volunteers to pull this off. To find out what you can do please contact Linda Sternbach at linda.sternbach@gmail.com or our volunteer coordinator Sue Pritchett at pritchettsue@gmail.com. They will be able to get you in the right group.
The March 17th MMS lease sale proved yet again that the rumors of the death of exploration in the Gulf of Mexico have been greatly exaggerated. In the Central GOM Lease Sale 213, 642 bids were received on 468 leases, an increase of 34% over the 2009 Central GOM Sale. The sale had 949 million dollars in high bids. The GOM has no shortage of exploration potential. In fact, the geologists in the companies I have talked to stated that the real problem was not that they had no prospects to bid upon but that they had too many for the amount of money their company had allotted. This resulted in extremely high-grading of prospects. Indeed some of the better prospects were dropped out of fear that they couldn’t bid enough to get them. One company even said they cut back on all exploration and lease sale funds because they had such tremendous exploration success in 2009. That’s right, they said they had so much success they no longer have money for exploration. The truth is that many companies pared back their lease budgets this year for any number of reasons. We geologists all know how extremely short-sighted that is. Unfortunately most companies are not run by geologists. Companies are always boasting they are going to “Grow through the drill bit”. It is a catchy phrase: the bankers and stockholders love it; it looks great in print, and makes the CEO sound bold. Unfortunately, like the “think outside the box” expression I mentioned a few months ago, they don’t really mean it. ”Growing through the drill bit” means upfront expenditures for things like…oh, I don’t know… leases, maybe? These expenditures may never bear fruit and therefore have an element of risk associated with them. It seems fairly straightforward that you can’t grow through the drill bit if, to mix metaphors a bit, you don’t step up to the plate and obtain leases upon which to drill. Perhaps they know a way around that, but I can’t imagine what it is. There again, I am just a geologist trying to find oil and gas.
Many geologists, who present prospects only to have them turned down, quite often for non-geologic reasons, may feel a bit discouraged. That is understandable. The trick is not to give up. We have to look at ourselves as Columbus trying to find the ‘New World’. His biggest struggle was not in the voyage but in trying to find political and financial backing (sound familiar?). He had to convince the people in power that his idea had merit and that the potential reward far outweighed the risk of failure. In other words he had a great P-10! Still it took him seven long years and presenting to no less than six monarchs to obtain the backing of a government. He had already lined up investor backing to defray more than 50% of the cost. While he may not have discovered a new route to Asia, one could hardly call his voyage a failure. The point is, he didn’t give up. I once had a prospect that I presented for four years straight only to have it turned down every time. That company was purchased by another oil company (shocking, I know) who turned it down as well. I changed companies and finally got a taker! It had taken over six years and three different companies but I had my prospect. Fortunately for me the well came in and I received royalties for the next ten years. Perseverance, along with thick skin, is absolutely essential for exploration geologists. We must “endeavor to persevere”! Companies may not always listen to your arguments; in fact they may turn down the majority of your prospects. But that does not mean they are bad prospects. Quite often it means that the company is trying to spread out its risk or finances or adhere to some big five-year plan conceived by people who wouldn’t know a rock if it fell on their heads. Don’t give up.
Endeavor to persevere.
There is an old saying that you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink. I would add that if you keep leading the same horse to the water and he won’t drink, you either have to find a different pond he will drink from... or get a new horse. Happy Hunting!
The Wise Report
May 7, 2010
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The 2010 revision of RG-411, Investigating and Reporting Releases from Petroleum Storage Tanks (PSTs), is now available for download from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) webpage at: http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/comm_exec/forms_pubs/pubs/rg/rg-411.html.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Railroad Commission of Texas withdraws the proposal published in the November 6, 2009, issue of the Texas Register (34 TexReg 7730) and proposes amendments to §11.71 and §11.72, relating to Purpose and Authority; and Applicability; new §11.73 and §11.74, relating to Uranium Exploration Forms; and Information Subject to Public Review; amendments to §11.81 and §11.82, relating to Statutory Definitions; and Regulatory Definitions; amendments to §§11.92 - 11.100, relating to Permit Application; Elements of Permit Application; Application Approval; Bonding, Insurance, Payment of Fees; Permit Issuance; Renewal; Transfer; Permit Approval; and Permit Denial; amendments to §11.113 and §11.114, relating to Revocation or Suspension without Consent and Revision on Motion or with Consent; and new rules §§11.131 - 11.142, relating to Uranium Exploration Permit: General Provisions; Application to Conduct Uranium Exploration Activity; Uranium Exploration Permit Revision; Uranium Exploration Permit Renewal; Uranium Exploration Permit Transfer; Uranium Exploration Permit Fees; Commission Notice of Uranium Exploration Permit Application, Issuance, and Denial; Uranium Exploration Drill Site Operating and Reclamation Requirements; Uranium Exploration Drill Site Plugging and Reporting Requirements; Commission and Groundwater Conservation District Jurisdiction; Groundwater Quality and Well Information; and Groundwater Analysis and Reporting; amendments to §§11.151 - 11.153, relating to Plan; Standards; and Alternative Methods; amendments to §11.181 and §11.182, relating to Closing, and Release; amendments to §11.194, relating to Release from Reporting Requirement; amendments to §11.203, relating to Duration of Liability; and amendments to §11.206, relating to Release or Reduction of Bonds. The Commission is publishing a new proposal that incorporates revisions based on some of the comments the Commission received on the version of the proposed rules published in the Texas Register on November 6, 2009. For more information go to: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/texreg/sos/PROPOSED/16.ECONOMIC%20REGULATION.html#40
and: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/texreg/sos/WITHDRAWN/16.ECONOMIC%20REGULATION.html#231
The Wise Report Henry M. Wise, P.G. 5/7/2010
The Wise Report
April 25, 2010
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists (TBPG) has adopted new rules regarding advisory opinions, the Geoscientist-in-Training (GIT) Program, an amendment to §851.80 establishes an initial application fee and a subsequent annual renewal fee of $25 for a GIT certificate, and an amendment to §851.106 regarding geoscientists to report to the TBPG any known or suspected violation of the Texas Geoscience Practice Act or Board rules.
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
4/25/2010
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
April 18, 2010
A Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Operator Training Rule Stakeholder Meeting will be held on April 27, 2010. The meeting is open to the public and will provide a brief overview of proposed rule changes which will: 1) add requirements for Operator Training at Underground Storage Tank (UST) Facilities in a manner that meets federal law; and 2) make less substantive changes to existing administrative and technical UST rules as necessary to simplify and clarify them. Attendees will have the opportunity to ask questions and participate in open discussion. Additional information can be found at: http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/remediation/rpr/documents/PST_Stakeholder_Meeting_April27.doc
Henry M. Wise, P.G.The Wise Report4/18/2010
A Look Through Someone Else’s Glasses
Over the past few months I have been reading a number of books on the value of diversity.Not the visual diversity that is often discussed by corporate and political leaders but the diversity of thought. Thought diversity provides for more effective leadership as well as increased innovation. It allows us to look outside of our own limits and provides us with a much broader perspective providing the benefits gained from the knowledge and experiences of others. The problems that we are asked to solve today often require the bridging between disciplines and thought diversity provides us with the potential exposure to those alternative solutions that our own tunneled vision would not permit us to see.So why bring this topic up for discussion now? Just this past week, I attended a conference and there were a few papers that I listened to dealing with petrophysics and geophysics. Not what I consider my areas of expertise but they were part of the program. Each of these papers had a long list of co-authors. To the best of my knowledge all of the co-authors had similar technical backgrounds. The papers were technically solid and offered some incremental advancement in exploration and production workflows. During the presentations I found myself jotting down some notes. There is nothing unusual in my note taking except that these notes were not directly capturing the thoughts of the presenters but rather how I might intertwine their work with mine. When the speakers’ presentations were done I shared some of these ideas and how I felt we could jointly benefit by collaboration. An e-mail and a hallway discussion have since followed. I am not yet clear how far this new collaboration might go or whether a step change in our understanding or workflow process will occur but it is an opportunity. Both sides were open to the idea that we could benefit from the knowledge and experiences of the other and aware of the potential that the whole may be greater than the sum of its parts.
This month many of us will be attending the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual Convention in New Orleans. This will be a great opportunity for learning, the capturing of diversity of thought among those active in our industry and science, as well as for networking. In the past I have found myself sitting through sessions and listening to papers in areas technically similar to those that I work in. Clearly, there are benefits to this type of activity. It keeps me current in my field and provides an opportunity for me to maintain my established network.
I must admit that very often I am disappointed because what has been presented provides for only incremental advancement in my understanding in my area of expertise. This year I am going to try something different and hope that I will add significantly to my knowledge base. I am going to sit through a few sessions outside of my area of expertise and seek out a few presenters to discuss their work and its implications. I would like to challenge each of you to do the same. Attend at least one complete session outside of your technical specialty or geographic area of responsibility and after the session ends find at least one of the speakers and discuss his or her work. This should provide some diversity of thought as to how you examine your own work problems and should also broaden your professional network. You might find an unexpected technology link or a better analogue. I know that I am hoping to do so. This broadening should also help us to continue to prepare for the continuing changes in our industry by allowing us to broaden our potential opportunities. How many among us, ten years ago, would have thought that shales and mudstones would be considered a reservoir of ever growing importance?
As important as the information conveyed in the oral and poster presentations is, the expansion of the professional network may be even more important. Even with all of the social networking sites that exist, I am surprised at how narrowly focused all of our networks tend to be. We all tend to build networks, independent of their size, of people similar to ourselves, sharing common beliefs and similar skills. Although these networks are valuable they do not necessarily provide for the diversity of thought that allows for the innovation through the merging of different technologies. Remember that many of the greatest innovations have resulted from the touch points where independent technologies were brought together. Just consider developments in such fields as basin modeling, seismic data acquisition and processing, and well logging all of which are technologies that cross boundaries.
Before I close, I must note that two of our members Fred Walsh and Bill Bishop contacted me about a spelling error on the cover of our February Bulletin. There were several other minor errors present in that issue. (No need to contact me about them. Some of these errors are obvious and some not so. There are no prizes.) Although not an excuse, the February issue is prepared on a very short schedule between the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, as Editor I take full responsibility and will do my best in the remaining 12 issues under my tenure to prevent such errors from reoccurring. I will also put in-place a plan to handle those rushed months where there is limited time to prepare and review the draft Bulletin before it goes to the printer. For those concerned we have corrected the cover, table of contents, and article in the Bulletin posted on the HGS website.
Until next time…
Innovate and Create But Do Your Homework
Laissez Les Bon Temps Roulez!! Yes, it’s AAPG Convention time in New Orleans! What a year New Orleans is having! First they won the Super Bowl and now they are hosting the AAPG Convention! It just doesn’t get any better than that! The convention promises to be a good one with some innovative talks.
Innovation is one of the hallmarks of our industry. Finding oil is always a good thing (unless of course, it is under your car when you walk out of the office in the afternoon). Finding oil in a place or formation where “everyone” knows it doesn’t exist is fantastic! Usually such a find starts with a wild idea some geologist, who obviously didn’t pay attention in college or he would know better, puts forth to explain something that he/she can’t explain otherwise. The geologist is usually soundly chastised for proposing such heresy and sent back to his office to think about the error of his ways. The trouble is that the idea can’t be put back in his head and as an idea will do, it sticks with most who have heard it. Somewhere in the back of their minds the other geologists have another thing to be looking for and a few may even start finding it. This makes them start pondering the “wild” idea more seriously. After a time the idea has become less wild and more in the category of ‘possible’. Eventually some geologist manages to convince management to risk the wild idea by drilling a well. This usually happens because management is desperate to find a place for the rig they have under contract or they are tired of hearing the geologist go on about the prospect year after year, or some combination of the two. The prospect gets permitted which is of course of public record. At this point something interesting starts to happen. Like a group of penguins on the edge of the ice cliff all the other oil companies start crowding around. Like the first penguin going into the sea, the first company starts to drill the well. The other penguins watch. Will the first penguin get eaten by the everpresent sharks? The well is successful and just like the penguins all the companies start jumping into play. Managements of other companies are now busy trying to explain why their company didn’t see such an obvious play! Never mind that their own geologists had seen it and been unsuccessful in convincing management to go forward. The race is on.
Leasing becomes a frenzy with speculators getting into the fray. This scenario has repeated itself many times. I remember at the dawn of my career, back when 2½ D seismic was cutting edge and everything was done on paper sections, the Tuscaloosa was the ultimate play. Farmers were becoming millionaires over night just from the leasing bonus. Many companies did very well early on, but eventually companies had pushed it further just to get leases, and like sharks sweeping through the penguins the dry holes started taking their toll. The companies that did the best were those who committed time and resources into understanding the play prior to jumping into it. The Tuscaloosa plays of yesterday are the shale plays of today. The frenzied activities of the shale plays is breathtaking to watch. The investment advisors and investment magazine editors have extolled the virtues of having “dry hole” proof plays that stretch for miles on end. Their theme song, “One simply has to drill a hole, put a pipe in the ground, a valve on top and voilá instant money!” Not only that, but the reserves can produce at a steady rate for 20 years! This allows the bankers to plug in numbers and make projections that they and their investors can count on. That’s the plan at any rate.
Geologists, of course, know better. Shales are incredibly complex. The geologic variability is immense and requires dedicated geoscientists to understand them and where to optimally buy leases and drill wells. In addition, the shales come with their own set of problems, such as fracking, low producing rates which require large numbers of wells (all of which will require remedial work and plugging at some point) and they are manpower intensive. The shale wells, due to their typically low production rates are even more susceptible to gas price fluxuation than those producing from conventional reservoirs.
Don’t get me wrong. I am not dogging the Shale Plays. They can be a viable part of a company’s portfolio, if the company can look past the hype and invest in real geologic analysis by geoscientists who have actually worked these types of plays. Unfortunately I fear many companies are not doing the geologic work that would be required in any conventional play, because their management has the “sure thing” mentality about the shales. The shales are not sure things, as any geologist who has worked them will tell you. The companies that put honest geologists in the forefront of any play decision or acquisition are the ones that will succeed. As in any other play, there will be winners and losers. The big winners will be the companies that did their homework, listened to their geoscientists, took educated risks, and got into the play before the feeding frenzy began. The losers will be those who simply followed the crowd.
In the meantime we geologists are busy thinking up wild ideas. Somewhere, someone is trying desperately to convince their management of a wild idea that will eventually turn into the next Tuscaloosa, deep gas, sub-salt, or even shale play!Happy Hunting!
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
April 11, 2010
The annual update of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Tier 1 protective concentration limit (PCL) tables is now available on the TRRP PCLs web page at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/trrp/trrppcls.html. For instructions on how to use the Tier 1 tables, please refer to Tier 1 PCL Tables (RG-366/TRRP-23), and for information on their applicability, see Toxicity Factors and Chemical/Physical Parameters (RG-366/TRRP-19). Both documents are available on the TRRP Guidance and Forms web page, http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/trrp/guidance.html. For questions on changes to toxicity factors, please contact the TCEQ Toxicology section at 512-239-1795.
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The Wise Report
4/11/2010
The Wise Report
April 4, 2010
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The TCEQ has updated theTCEQ Remediation Division Correspondence ID Form (TCEQ-20248). Use of the form will expedite the processing of reports and correspondence received by the Remediation Division and will better ensure the accuracy of data entered into the agency's databases. They asks that you complete and submit this form as a cover sheet for all correspondence and reports submitted to the TCEQ Remediation Division cleanup programs on or after June 1, 2010. Instructions are available in PDF format and the form itself is available in MS Word format on the Remediation Division cleanup program web pages and at: http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/announcements.html
Henry M. Wise, P.G.
The Wise Report
April 4, 2010
PRESIDENT ELECT
Steven A. Earle
Bio for Steven A. Earle
Martin Cassidy
Bio For Martin Cassidy
Vice-President
Steven Getz
Bio For Steven Getz
Amy E. Sullivan
Bio For Amy E. Sullivan
Secretary
George Devries Klein
Bio For George Devries Klein
Corrected Statement
Cecelia Baum
Bio For Cecelia Baum
Editor-Elect
Ron F. Waszczak
Bio For Ron F. Waszczak
Director
John A. Adamick
Bio For John Adamick
Matthew R. Cowan
Bio For Matthew R. Cowan
Dianna Phu
Bio For Dianna Phu
Justin Vandenbrink
http://www.hgs.org/en/ballots/options/qview.asp?bal
The Wise Report
Henry M. Wise, P.G.March 26, 2010
The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Railroad Commission of Texas and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality is being updated. This update will reflect changes brought about due to legislation passed during the last two sessions. The revisions deal with NORM, solid waste, disposal wells, enhanced recovery wells, brine mining, geologic storage of carbon dioxide, hydrocarbon storage, geothermal energy, in situ tar sands, and uranium exploration and mining. The proposed MOU can be found at: http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/prop-amend-3-30-MOU.pdf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justin McNamee of Rowlett is replacing Ben Harris of Plano, who resigned, on the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists for a term to expire February 1, 2015. We thank Mr. Harris for his service and wish Mr. McNamee the best of luck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Railroad Commission of Texas proposes new Chapter 5, relating to carbon dioxide, to implement Senate Bill (SB) 1387, 81st Legislature (Regular Session, 2009), which was effective September 1, 2009. SB 1387 amended the Texas Water Code and the Texas Natural Resources Code to provide for the implementation of projects involving the capture, injection, sequestration, or geologic storage of carbon dioxide. The purpose of the proposed rules is to protect underground sources of drinking water while promoting the capture and storage of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. The proposed chapter can be found at: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/texreg/sos/PROPOSED/16.ECONOMIC%20REGULATION.html#163
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I recieved a copy of a February 26, 2010 letter from US Representative Pete Sessions to the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists. Representative Sessions is seeking input regarding how the Administration’s 2011 Budget and associated spending priorities may impact energy exploration and production. A few budget provisions that he discussed were:
The bottom line for the above is an increase in taxes for Oil and Gas Companies of an estimated $18.2 billion over five years and $36.6 billion over 10 years.
Oil and gas isn't the only industry under the gun. Coal is also going to see an increase in taxes:
These will result in an increase in coal company taxes of approximately $1 billion over five years and $2.3 billion over ten years.
Reprentative Sessions is a member of the Rules Committee and is responsible for handling the Rule for energy bills that will come to the House floor for a vote. If you have questions or would like to make comments to Representative Sessions, He requests that you contact his Legislative Assistant, Evan Shoop at 202-225-2231 or email her at Evan.ShoopWmail.house.gov.Henry M. Wise, P.G.The Wise Report3/26/2010
To post non-HGS events and articles that have not appeared in the HGS Bulletin, contact the webmaster@hgs.org for approval.
Vendors of geoscience products and services (for-profit) can buy website ad space by contacting the webmaster@hgs.org. To see the ad rates, click here.
HGS Website How To's
Science and Our Children
For the second year I visited my daughter’s elementary school and discussed the world’s quest for energy. No, my daughter Rebecca is not a student, but rather a fifth grade science teacher. Rebecca has spent her seven year career teaching in Title 1 schools, where most of the students come from economically disadvantaged homes. Since moving to Houston, every year she has requested that I teach a geology lesson to her students. She wants to provide an opportunity for exposure to a working scientist.My visit, the geology curriculum, and the headlines were in perfect alignment. The students and I discussed a number of world events and other topics. I emphasize the word discussed because these were two-way conversations. Subjects included the causes and effects of earthquakes, the geologic map of North America, which HGS donated to the students of Hemmenway Elementary School, and the story of energy including fossil fuels and renewables.
I was impressed by the students’ grasp of the facts and their logical thought processes. They were truly interested in science and found geology exciting. In fact, we ran out of time and then Rebecca joked, “Perhaps we should work through lunch”, and the kids actually cheered. I was totally surprised. The question that we need to examine is what happens from the time these kids leave elementary school and complete middle and high school. Politicians have discussed the standing of U.S. eighth grade student’s science abilities for several years. Based on the 2007 TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study), U.S. students ranked 11th in science, behind students from such countries as Singapore, England, and Slovenia. By the time our children complete high school much of their interest in science has waned, their factual knowledge has weakened, and geology is far from a career choice. Meanwhile, foreign students fight to get into American universities. Some of these students will remain here but many will return to their country of origin and will compete against our children, who will be less prepared to take on the challenge.
The question is why do our elementary students who so eagerly study science become nonparticipants a few years later. There are no simple answers or solutions. A senior executive from Chevron once asked a number of senior and high performing employees how to keep the staff from leaving. My response was that people stay where their job is challenging, exciting, and fun. I believe that the same idea applies to students. They will remain interested in science and mathematics as long as those criteria are met.
So how might this elevated interest level in science be achieved? In the classroom, teacher s need to focus on hands -on experimentation and relevancy rather than a focus on the memorization of “facts”. These “facts” will soon be forgotten after the test has been taken. Experimentation permits a more thorough understanding of the concepts and allows the student to remain engaged. Science education should focus on the news and everyday activities, which make science more relevant. Earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, shuttle and satellite launches all provide excellent topics for discussion between student and teacher dealing with plate tectonics, climate, atmospheric circulation, natural cycles, man’s exploration of space, and so on. Food safety, baking, freezing ice cubes, boiling water, changes in the length of the day offer additional areas for hands-on learning.
Teachers shouldn’t be asked to fight the classroom battle without “backup troops”. Industry scientists need to team with schools and become partners in science education. With regular visits to the classrooms by geologists, chemists, biologists, and others engaged in research and the application of science and mathematics students will have viable role models. A single visit once a year by a single geologist or chemist is not sufficient. Mentoring programs need to be established and corporations that rely on the sciences and mathematics for their growth and future need to encourage and support such activities by the employees. They need to provide time, resources, and even the opportunities for site visits. Administrators need to make the necessary resources and training available to the teachers to allow hands-on activities. The curriculum should have sufficient flexibility to account for the study of actual scientific events as they occur. They need to remember that advances in science require one to learn critical thinking in addition to the basic fundamentals.
Parents have an important role to play. Children need to visit local museums, the zoo, aquarium and parks. To the best of their abilities they need to explain what they are seeing. They also need to explain what is happening in their surroundings. Explaining such things as why we wrap pipes when freezing conditions come, how planes stay up, and that electricity doesn’t magically appear from the wall become part of the parenting role. This may mean that parents may need to go back to “school” and do a little learning themselves. A simple “because” is not an acceptable answer. Some of us may start by reading Bill Bryson’s A Short History of Nearly Everything, while others may simply switch from the Cartoon Network to the Discovery Channel.
Our kids also have a part to play. They must ask us why and push for explanations, when necessary. They need to ask us to take them to places where they can learn and explore rather than simply sit in front of their video game or head to the mall. And, finally they need to accept that the easiest class is not always the best class. They need to look for those that challenge them. When Rebecca asked me to provide a lesson on geology, she was attempting to reach her students on several levels. They took part in a hands-on demonstration, discussed world events, were exposed to a working scientist, and learned about the role of geologists. I hope that I have been able to reach at least one student. Perhaps one day, Chevron will meet a young geologist who was inspired by my participation. As someone who has been involved in science for more than four decades, I remain engaged because I always seem to find a challenge, excitement in finding something new, and fun in the process of discovery.
Until next time…
Where Are All Those Faults?
Spring!! Yes, it is upon us! For those of us involved in the Federal Offshore it is almost time to put those lease sale maps aside and see the sunlight again! Time to shake off the winter doldrums and get outside! There is the spring yard work to do, the spring sports activities with the kids, maybe even a little golf could be squeezed in there as well? It is also a great time to start or get involved in new projects at the HGS. Hey this is the HGS Bulletin! What did you expect? There is a project I would like to start and I need volunteers to help with every aspect of it. The HGS at one time had a field trip guide showing the faults of Houston. Traffic, congestion, crime…No I mean the REAL faults of Houston! There is quite a bit of information out there on Houston and the surrounding areas’ active faults. For instance, in 2005 former HGS Vice President Art Berman gave a talk entitled “The Debate Over Subsidence in Coastal Louisiana and Texas” in which he discussed such things as the famous Long Point – Eureka – Heights fault system as illustrated in these photos taken by Art previously published in this bulletin.
In 2008 U of H professor Shuhab Khan and Richard Engelkemeir, a PhD student, mapped more than 300 surface faults in the Houston area using lidar technology. The result of their work was a comprehensive fault map which can be viewed at http://www.uh.edu/news-events/archive/nr/2008/04april/ geological-faultsph.html. I would like the HGS to put together a field guide which could be used by schools as well as purchased by our members. Documenting faults that have visible surface expressions and putting them in a cohesive easy-to-use guide will take time and dedication. The area to be covered is very large and the surface expressions can be subtle. This will take volunteers getting out and photographing fault scarps and cracks, making detailed location notes, and tying all this back into the appropriate fault system. It will take a dedicated group to organize, compile, and publish such a guide. Make no mistake, it is an ambitious task to put together a quality publication the HGS can be proud to offer our members and the public. I would like to especially ask our retired HGS members to consider participating in this project. Your experience as well as your time would be of great value in such an endeavor. I truly believe that this is the type of publication that will help the HGS give back to the community in a very unique and important way. We have the expertise and the ability, now we need the manpower! Please contact Sue Pritchett, our volunteer coordinator (pritchettsue@gmail.com) to express your desire to join the committee that will put this guide together. Perhaps we can even have it in time for the 2011 AAPG convention. There are faults visible in every school district, which would make for great quick field trips for literally thousands of kids. Perhapsmore importantly, such a guide may interest kids in geology and observing active geologic processes in their own back yards. Such a guide would be another way to make kids, and the rest of us for that matter, realize that we do not have to spend a great deal of money and travel to exotic places to observe geology in action. We merely have to use our eyes and observe the earth around us.
I hope everyone enjoyed the Mudstone Conference in February. Another successful meeting for what is now the premier shale conference in the world. Thanks to all the HGS members who volunteered their time to make this possible.
We have a lot of excellent talks coming up this month, such as the dinner meeting talk by former HGS President Clint Moore entitled, “Pioneering the Global Subsalt/Presalt Play: The World Beyond Mahogany (USA) Field” and the HGS general Lunch presentation by Lauren Peschier of Newfield entitled, “The Boquillas (Eagle Ford) Formation of South Texas: Potential Outcrop Analogs for Nonconventional Eagle Ford Shale Reservoirs in the Subsurface”. I hope to see you at these great talks! Have a great “Spring Break”!
Click here to download March 2010 HGS Bulletin